From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5096 invoked by alias); 25 Dec 2004 00:58:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5056 invoked by uid 48); 25 Dec 2004 00:58:22 -0000 Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 00:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041225005822.5055.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041225000920.19151.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20041225000920.19151.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/19151] [4.0 Regression] configure: Could not load module ../libiberty/libiberty.a(libiberty.so.0) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg03503.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-25 00:58 ------- Again I really think it was inappropriate at this late stage to change how libiberty was building. Mark could you comment on if it was inappropriate or not because this change also causes one other regresssion (PR 19135) and it was committed just last week? -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hjl at lucon dot org, | |mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Keywords| |build Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19151