public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug java/19173] New: problems resolving classes
@ 2004-12-28 11:01 ora dot et dot labora at web dot de
2004-12-28 11:06 ` [Bug java/19173] " ora dot et dot labora at web dot de
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ora dot et dot labora at web dot de @ 2004-12-28 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
GCJ appears to have a problem with statement 'import <package>.*'
in case all files to be imporated are given as compilation
arguments. The very same works fine using SUN's javac compiler.
{* Upps, how can I upload something here? Anyway, the whole sub-
ject has been investigated by Tom (tromey@redhat.com) and a small
demo project has been sent. *}
Here's a literal description of the demo project: This
are the project files:
$ tar zxvf xxx.tgz
xxx/
xxx/impl/
xxx/impl/Echo.java
xxx/hello.java
This is the file's contents:
================ hello.java =============================
package greeting;
import greeting.impl.*;
public class hello {
static Echo myecho;
}
================ Echo.java ==============================
package greeting.impl;
public class Echo {}
========================================================
Now I'm going to compile the whole package in one shot:
$ cd xxx
javac -d . -C hello.java impl/Echo.java # ok
=>> Works fine!
Remove files created by 'javac':
$ rm -rf greeting
Try to compile the very same using gcj:
$ gcj -d . -C hello.java impl/Echo.java
hello.java:3: error: Can't find default package `greeting.impl'. \
Check the CLASSPATH environment variable and the access to the archives
1 error
The problem appears to be related to
import hello.impl.*;
in hello.java. When changing to read
import hello.impl.Echo ;
compilation using gcj works fine. Another option is to
rename directory "xxx" into "greeting" and to use -I ..,
ie.
$ cd ..
$ mv xxx greeting
$ cd greeting
$ gcj -d . -I .. -C hello.java impl/Echo.java
--
Summary: problems resolving classes
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ora dot et dot labora at web dot de
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,java-prs at gcc dot gnu
dot org,tromey at redhat dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19173
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/19173] problems resolving classes
2004-12-28 11:01 [Bug java/19173] New: problems resolving classes ora dot et dot labora at web dot de
@ 2004-12-28 11:06 ` ora dot et dot labora at web dot de
2004-12-28 14:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ora dot et dot labora at web dot de @ 2004-12-28 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ora dot et dot labora at web dot de 2004-12-28 11:05 -------
Created an attachment (id=7835)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7835&action=view)
original demo project for bug 19173
Ahh, here we go. The initial bug reporting page should mention that an
attachment might be added a f t e r having commited the bug report.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19173
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/19173] problems resolving classes
2004-12-28 11:01 [Bug java/19173] New: problems resolving classes ora dot et dot labora at web dot de
2004-12-28 11:06 ` [Bug java/19173] " ora dot et dot labora at web dot de
@ 2004-12-28 14:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-29 11:36 ` phil at mkdoc dot com
2005-03-29 14:12 ` ora dot et dot labora at web dot de
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-28 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|critical |normal
Keywords| |rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19173
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/19173] problems resolving classes
2004-12-28 11:01 [Bug java/19173] New: problems resolving classes ora dot et dot labora at web dot de
2004-12-28 11:06 ` [Bug java/19173] " ora dot et dot labora at web dot de
2004-12-28 14:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-29 11:36 ` phil at mkdoc dot com
2005-03-29 14:12 ` ora dot et dot labora at web dot de
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: phil at mkdoc dot com @ 2005-03-29 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From phil at mkdoc dot com 2005-03-29 11:36 -------
This appears to be a duplicate of bug 10894.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |phil at mkdoc dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19173
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/19173] problems resolving classes
2004-12-28 11:01 [Bug java/19173] New: problems resolving classes ora dot et dot labora at web dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-03-29 11:36 ` phil at mkdoc dot com
@ 2005-03-29 14:12 ` ora dot et dot labora at web dot de
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ora dot et dot labora at web dot de @ 2005-03-29 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ora dot et dot labora at web dot de 2005-03-29 14:12 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> This appears to be a duplicate of bug 10894.
I think you are correct - looks like I missed entry 19173. Nevertheless, I like
my entry because my entry is short, clear and precise.
Will this bug ever be fixed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19173
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/19173] problems resolving classes
[not found] <bug-19173-9856@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2007-01-09 20:51 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-09 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:46 -------
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19173
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-09 20:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-12-28 11:01 [Bug java/19173] New: problems resolving classes ora dot et dot labora at web dot de
2004-12-28 11:06 ` [Bug java/19173] " ora dot et dot labora at web dot de
2004-12-28 14:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-29 11:36 ` phil at mkdoc dot com
2005-03-29 14:12 ` ora dot et dot labora at web dot de
[not found] <bug-19173-9856@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2007-01-09 20:51 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).