From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17309 invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2004 15:16:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17259 invoked by uid 48); 28 Dec 2004 15:16:54 -0000 Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041228151654.17258.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041228143407.19176.hideishi@graduate.chiba-u.jp> References: <20041228143407.19176.hideishi@graduate.chiba-u.jp> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/19176] static gcc cannot be build (libgcc_eh.a required for static gcc) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg03740.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 15:16 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Really only building static is not supported on darwin. I will look into the > problem but only after a week > > if no one else has looked into this. > So, what I mean by static gcc is "gcc which produces binaries free of > shared-gcc-libraries". And that is a problem, libgcc_s is required for correct running in terms of exceptions. Also it is not hard to cp libgcc_s with libgfortran and such. Also telling people to set DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH is not hard, people do it all the time on linux and almost all other unix OS's. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19176