From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3610 invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2004 17:47:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3593 invoked by uid 48); 28 Dec 2004 17:47:26 -0000 Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 17:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041228174726.3592.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "hp at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041106211936.18321.hp@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20041106211936.18321.hp@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/18321] [3.2 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.c-torture/compile/20031023-4.c -O0, -O1 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg03770.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 17:47 ------- A bug in the epilogue code: using "int" instead of HOST_WIDE_INT. This is a regression from 3.2, where the code got a clear error (the test-case wasn't present there, though): /gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20031023-1.c: In function `bar': /gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20031023-1.c:38: stack frame too big A fix seems trivial. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |hp at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2004-11-08 02:05:47 |2004-12-28 17:47:26 date| | Summary|mmix-knuth-mmixware |[3.2 regression] mmix-knuth- |testsuite failure: gcc.c- |mmixware testsuite failure: |torture/compile/20031023-4.c|gcc.c- |-O0, -O1 |torture/compile/20031023-4.c | |-O0, -O1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18321