From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-124319-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3111 invoked by alias); 29 Dec 2004 12:57:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3068 invoked by uid 48); 29 Dec 2004 12:57:43 -0000
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 12:57:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20041229125743.3067.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20031030234001.12850.jens.maurer@gmx.net>
References: <20031030234001.12850.jens.maurer@gmx.net>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/12850] memory consumption for heavy template instantiations tripled since 3.3
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg03852.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-29 12:57 -------
I've been looking at a bunch of C++ codes, 160000 or 320000 seems like 
a reasonable value for CP_LEXER_BUFFER_SIZE. 
 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12850