public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/19038] [4.0 Regression] out-of ssa causing loops to have more than one BB
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:06:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041229210601.20897.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041216155140.19038.dje@gcc.gnu.org>


------- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com  2004-12-29 21:06 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.0 Regression] out-of ssa
	causing loops to have more than one BB

On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 20:50 +0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-29 20:50 -------
> The reference patch does not fix the problem all the time, see PR 14741 for a testcase where the patch 
> fails, and it fails still for sixtrack but I should note that this would be now caused by IV-OPTs.
I don't expect to fix it all the time.  There's a fundamental problem in that
copy propagation can lengthen lifetimes and thus require a copy at
out-of-ssa time.  The patch is meant to fix those cases which can be
trivially detected and for which we can generate better code.


Changing the out-of-ssa code to use Sreedhar's algorithm (which appears
to do a lot better at avoiding copies) isn't something I'd advocate
for 4.1.  But even with a better out-of-ssa algorithm there are still
going to be cases where out-of-ssa is going to have to generate a
copy.  No way around it.

Now if you think that PR is a trivial case that should be caught, then,
show me why and I'll take a closer look.

jeff




-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19038


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-12-29 21:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-16 15:52 [Bug rtl-optimization/19038] New: Loop header copying dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-16 21:39 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/19038] " dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-16 22:55 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-17  4:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-17  4:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-17  4:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-17  4:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-20 18:25 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19038] [4.0 Regression] out-of ssa causing loops to have more than one BB pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-20 19:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-20 19:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-20 19:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-22 19:03 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-23  2:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-23 15:19 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-23 16:00 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-24 12:13 ` mustafa at il dot ibm dot com
2004-12-24 12:42 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-24 12:46 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-24 12:52 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-24 12:55 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-26  1:09 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-26 15:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-27 21:08 ` law at redhat dot com
2004-12-28  8:22 ` law at redhat dot com
2004-12-28  9:18 ` law at redhat dot com
2004-12-28 23:32 ` law at redhat dot com
2004-12-29 19:33 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-29 20:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-29 20:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-29 21:06 ` law at redhat dot com [this message]
2004-12-30 17:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-30 18:39 ` law at redhat dot com
2004-12-30 18:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-30 21:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-04  4:04 ` law at redhat dot com
2005-01-04  4:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-10 20:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-12 13:34 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2005-01-18  0:50 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19038] [4.0 Regression] ivopts " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-18  5:02 ` law at redhat dot com
2005-01-19 22:50 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-19 23:25 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19038] [4.0 Regression] out of ssa " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-19 23:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-20  0:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-20  0:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-20  1:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-21 13:18 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-21 13:22 ` rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz
2005-01-21 13:27 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-21 13:29 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19038] [4.0 Regression] tree-ssa " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-21 19:19 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-22  1:51 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-22 16:48 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-22 16:49 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041229210601.20897.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).