From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27184 invoked by alias); 30 Dec 2004 05:10:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27020 invoked by alias); 30 Dec 2004 05:10:33 -0000 Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 05:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041230051033.27019.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dberlin at dberlin dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041222003609.19124.hjl@lucon.org> References: <20041222003609.19124.hjl@lucon.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/19124] [4.0 regression] gcc generates incorrect dwarf2 debug info X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg03917.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-30 05:10 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] gcc generates incorrect dwarf2 debug info After talking with gdb folks and dwarf2 folks (who say this isn't the actual bug, there is some other gdb bug causing the crashes, because it doesn't depend on the end and base addresses being different), i'm going to close this as WONTFIX. It's impossible for us to generate location lists with a end address > base address, and nothing with any brainpower would depend on it :) > > ------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-12-30 03:38 ------- > While fixing the readelf bug: > > http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=615 > > I added a warning for bad location list. Even with your gcc patch applied, I > still get > > [hjl@gnu-10 gcc]$ /export/build/linux/binutils-debug/build-i686- > linux/binutils/readelf -w insn-preds.o > /dev/null > readelf: Warning: Bad location list at 00000d3d from 00000a72 to 00000a72 > > I will see what I can do with gdb. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19124