[Bug libstdc++/19060] New: fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[Bug libstdc++/19060] New: fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[wanderer at rsu dot ru]

Program:

---8X---------------------------
#include<fstream>

int main() {
  std::ofstream file("test.txt");
  std::streampos startpos = file.tellp();
  file << 10; 
  std::streampos endpos = file.tellp();
  assert(endpos != startpos);
  return 0;
}
---X8---------------------------

compile at g++ 3.4.3 and work fine, but fail after compile at g++ 4.0.0 
20041215 (mainline).

Also note: if set LD_LIBRARY_PATH point to gcc_34/lib (my gcc 3.4 lib 
directory) 
compiled with g++ 4.0 program work fine (using old gcc 3.4 shared libraries).

I think problem in code of "libstdc++.so.6" or "libgcc_s.so.1" 

Vladimir

-- 
           Summary: fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: libstdc++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: wanderer at rsu dot ru
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: i386-unknown-freebsd5.3-RC1
  GCC host triplet: i386-unknown-freebsd5.3-RC1
GCC target triplet: i386-unknown-freebsd5.3-RC1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug libstdc++/19060] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[wanderer at rsu dot ru]

------- Additional Comments From wanderer at rsu dot ru  2004-12-17 18:31 -------
Created an attachment (id=7773)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7773&action=view)
.s file


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug libstdc++/19060] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[wanderer at rsu dot ru]

------- Additional Comments From wanderer at rsu dot ru  2004-12-17 18:31 -------
Created an attachment (id=7772)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7772&action=view)
.ii file


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug libstdc++/19060] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-17 18:33 -------
Hmm, it works for me on ppc-darwin with the mainline (20041215 and 20041214 and 20041213).

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug libstdc++/19060] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[wanderer at rsu dot ru]

------- Additional Comments From wanderer at rsu dot ru  2004-12-17 18:44 -------
First time i see this problem in september-october.
Now i only fill PR.

Program work for me only if it used gcc 3.4.x shared libraries.

~/pkg/gcc/bin/g++ test.cc
setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH $HOME/pkg/gcc_34/lib
./a.out
setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH $HOME/pkg/gcc/lib
./a.out
Assertion failed: (endpos != startpos), function main, file test.cc, line 15.
Abort (core dumped)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug libstdc++/19060] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[wanderer at rsu dot ru]

------- Additional Comments From wanderer at rsu dot ru  2004-12-18 20:08 -------
At my FreebSD 5.3 problem show-up with GCC mainline sources in range:
At 2004-05-10 testcase work fine
At 2004-05-14 testcase failed
And i think this point to "The tree-ssa branch has been merged into mainline." 
event.

I will attempt locate problematic commit at tree-ssa branch.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug libstdc++/19060] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[pcarlini at suse dot de]

------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de  2004-12-19 00:03 -------
Cannot reproduce on i686-pc-linux-gnu too. I would suggest recategorizing as
'target'.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug libstdc++/19060] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[wanderer at rsu dot ru]

------- Additional Comments From wanderer at rsu dot ru  2004-12-24 00:05 -------
Good news: i found commit when problem arised: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
cvs/2003-10/msg01125.html
Before this commit testcase compile without problems.
After this commit testcase compilation failed.

Bad news: This is merge from mainline to tree-ssa.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug libstdc++/19060] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[pcarlini at suse dot de]

------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de  2004-12-31 11:07 -------
In my opinion, this is definitely a (target dependent) code generation bug,
rather serious, if confirmed. As such, we should do our best to reduce it
and recategorize in the right way. Any chance you can try to reduce it to a
short, pure c++ snippet? The relevant library code is quite straightforward.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug libstdc++/19060] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[wanderer at rsu dot ru]

------- Additional Comments From wanderer at rsu dot ru  2004-12-31 17:13 -------
At this moment i can't extract simple testcase.
But problem indeed in miscompiletion.

I am use modified testcase (additionl debug output line before assert (and 
iostream header include:
  std::cout << "begin==" << startpos << " end==" << endpos << "\n";

Valid output: "begin==0 end==8"
Invalid output:"begin==-1 end==-1"

I bootstrap GCC from current sources with additional -save-temps flag and 
compile and link libsupc++.a library and requred for my testcase .ii (renamed 
to .cc) files from libstdc++ library.

Final testcase executible work without problems with valid output.
But if i compile basic_file.cc (renamed .ii version) with -O2 option
then testcase executible run terminated with invalid output "begin==-1 end==-
1" and assert fail.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug libstdc++/19060] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[wanderer at rsu dot ru]

------- Additional Comments From wanderer at rsu dot ru  2004-12-31 17:15 -------
Created an attachment (id=7847)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7847&action=view)
.ii file from gcc build object directory


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug libstdc++/19060] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[wanderer at rsu dot ru]

------- Additional Comments From wanderer at rsu dot ru  2004-12-31 17:16 -------
Created an attachment (id=7848)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7848&action=view)
.s compiled from basic_file.cc with default oprions


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug libstdc++/19060] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[wanderer at rsu dot ru]

------- Additional Comments From wanderer at rsu dot ru  2004-12-31 17:17 -------
Created an attachment (id=7849)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7849&action=view)
.s compiled from basic_file.cc with -O2 (miscompiled version)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug libstdc++/19060] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[wanderer at rsu dot ru]

------- Additional Comments From wanderer at rsu dot ru  2004-12-31 17:58 -------
I extract problematic compiled (with -O2) function: 

---8X-----------------------------
#include <bits/basic_file.h>
#include <fcntl.h>

#include <limits> // For <off_t>::max() and min() and <streamsize>::max()

namespace std 
{
  streamoff
  __basic_file<char>::seekoff(streamoff __off, ios_base::seekdir __way)
  {
    if (__off > numeric_limits<off_t>::max()
	|| __off < numeric_limits<off_t>::min())
      return -1L;
    return lseek(this->fd(), __off, __way);
  }

}  // namespace std
---X8-----------------------------


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug libstdc++/19060] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[wanderer at rsu dot ru]

------- Additional Comments From wanderer at rsu dot ru  2004-12-31 17:58 -------
Created an attachment (id=7852)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7852&action=view)
.s compiled from basic_file.cc with default oprions


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug libstdc++/19060] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[wanderer at rsu dot ru]

------- Additional Comments From wanderer at rsu dot ru  2004-12-31 17:59 -------
Created an attachment (id=7853)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7853&action=view)
.s compiled from basic_file.cc with -O2 (miscompiled version)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug libstdc++/19060] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-31 18:20 -------
Hmm, this is the reduced testcase but it was not miscompiled as far as I can see:
typedef int __attribute__((__mode__(__DI__))) __int64_t;
typedef __int64_t int64_t;
typedef int64_t streamoff;
typedef __int64_t __off_t;
typedef __off_t off_t;

static long long min() throw() { return -9223372036854775807LL - 1; }
static long long max() throw() { return 9223372036854775807LL; }
__off_t lseek(int, __off_t, int);
streamoff
seekoff(streamoff __off)
{
  if (__off > max() || __off < min())
    return -1L;
  return 0;
}


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug libstdc++/19060] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[pcarlini at suse dot de]

------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de  2004-12-31 18:29 -------
Andrew, this is *definitely* target dependent: it's about such a basic feature
that we would have noticed, otherwise! (btw, thanks for the reduced testcase!)

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug libstdc++/19060] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[wanderer at rsu dot ru]

------- Additional Comments From wanderer at rsu dot ru  2004-12-31 18:39 -------
This more simplifed version of your last testcase also catch -O2 problem:

#include<cassert>

typedef int __attribute__((__mode__(__DI__))) off_t;

static long long min() throw() { return -9223372036854775807LL - 1; }
static long long max() throw() { return 9223372036854775807LL; }

void
seekoff(off_t __off)
{
  if (__off > max() || __off < min())
    assert(false);
}

int main() {
  seekoff(10);
  return 0;
}


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug tree-optimization/19060] [4.0 Regression] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-31 19:06 -------
Confirmed with your reduced testcase.

t21.dom1 is where the problem comes in.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
          Component|libstdc++                   |tree-optimization
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2004-12-31 19:06:10
               date|                            |
            Summary|fstream.tellp() result not  |[4.0 Regression]
                   |changed after some output   |fstream.tellp() result not
                   |                            |changed after some output
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.0.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug tree-optimization/19060] [4.0 Regression] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-31 19:13 -------
(In reply to comment #19)
> Confirmed with your reduced testcase.
> 
> t21.dom1 is where the problem comes in.

This also happens on i686-pc-linux.  I think this is related to HWI being only 32bit as it works with a 
x86_64 and -m32.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |critical
  GCC build triplet|i386-unknown-freebsd5.3-RC1 |
   GCC host triplet|i386-unknown-freebsd5.3-RC1 |
 GCC target triplet|i386-unknown-freebsd5.3-RC1 |i386-unknown-freebsd5.3,
                   |                            |i386-openbsd3.1
           Priority|P2                          |P1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug tree-optimization/19060] [4.0 Regression] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[pcarlini at suse dot de]

------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de  2004-12-31 19:24 -------
Yes, I can reproduce with the last testcase. Still, I can't with the original one,
that explains why we haven't noticed yet... Thanks to everyone.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug tree-optimization/19060] [4.0 Regression] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[pcarlini at suse dot de]

------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de  2004-12-31 19:27 -------
Ah, now I see: the problematic code path is actually used *only* when
_GLIBCXX_USE_LFS is not defined, whereas normally is defined, on linux.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug tree-optimization/19060] [4.0 Regression] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru]

------- Additional Comments From belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru  2004-12-31 19:38 -------
// C testcase

void abort (void);

static long long min ()
{
  return -9223372036854775807LL - 1;
}

void foo (long long j)
{
  if (j > 10 || j < min ())
    abort ();
}

int main ()
{
  foo (10);
  return 0;
}


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 GCC target triplet|i386-unknown-freebsd5.3,    |
                   |i386-openbsd3.1             |
      Known to fail|                            |4.0.0
      Known to work|                            |3.3.4 3.4.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug tree-optimization/19060] [4.0 Regression] fstream.tellp() result not changed after some output

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-31 19:40 -------
Note this is only reproducible with HWI being 32bit (x86 is an example but I cannot think of another 
one).

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 GCC target triplet|                            |i?86-*-*


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug tree-optimization/19060] [4.0 Regression] Miscompiling of if and "long long"

[jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2004-12-31 19:06:10         |2005-01-04 17:18:23
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug tree-optimization/19060] [4.0 Regression] Miscompiling of if and "long long"

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-04 18:42 -------
Patch here: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg00205.html>.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |patch


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug tree-optimization/19060] [4.0 Regression] Miscompiling of if and "long long"

[wanderer at rsu dot ru]

------- Additional Comments From wanderer at rsu dot ru  2005-01-14 20:57 -------
New patch proposed by Jakub Jelinek:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg00393.html
work fine at FreeBSD 5.3 and fix 52 tests in libstdc++ testsuite at FreeBSD 
5.3:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg00609.html

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug tree-optimization/19060] [4.0 Regression] Miscompiling of if and "long long"

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-15 09:46 -------
Subject: Bug 19060

CVSROOT:	/cvs/gcc
Module name:	gcc
Changes by:	jakub@gcc.gnu.org	2005-01-15 09:46:10

Modified files:
	gcc            : ChangeLog fold-const.c tree-ssa-dom.c 
	gcc/testsuite  : ChangeLog 
Added files:
	gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute: 20050104-1.c 

Log message:
	PR tree-optimization/19060
	* tree-ssa-dom.c (extract_range_from_cond) <case LT_EXPR, GT_EXPR>:
	Return 0 if op1 <= TYPE_MIN_VALUE () resp. op1 >= TYPE_MAX_VALUE ().
	(simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr): Add assert for dummy == 0
	and handle extract_range_from_cond returning false.
	* fold-const.c (fold): Optimize comparisons with min/max even for
	width > HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT.
	
	* gcc.c-torture/execute/20050104-1.c: New test.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.7133&r2=2.7134
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fold-const.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.492&r2=1.493
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.81&r2=2.82
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4889&r2=1.4890
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20050104-1.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug tree-optimization/19060] [4.0 Regression] Miscompiling of if and "long long"

[steven at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-15 12:46 -------
Jakub, can you please close bugs after you have commited your fixes?


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

Re: [Bug tree-optimization/19060] [4.0 Regression] Miscompiling of if and "long long"

[Andreas Tobler]

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-15 12:46 -------
> Jakub, can you please close bugs after you have commited your fixes?

Do not close it, it causes bootstrap failure on ppc linux.

[Bug tree-optimization/19060] [4.0 Regression] Miscompiling of if and "long long"

[toa at pop dot agri dot ch]

------- Additional Comments From toa at pop dot agri dot ch  2005-01-15 12:48 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.0 Regression] Miscompiling of
 if and "long long"

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-15 12:46 -------
> Jakub, can you please close bugs after you have commited your fixes?

Do not close it, it causes bootstrap failure on ppc linux.



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug tree-optimization/19060] [4.0 Regression] Miscompiling of if and "long long"

[andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-15 12:53 -------
Do not know if it is really this patch or if we uncover another problem:

/mnt/slice1/gcc-trunk/gcc/gcc/libgcc2.c: In function '__mulvdi3':
/mnt/slice1/gcc-trunk/gcc/gcc/libgcc2.c:279: internal compiler error: in
simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr, at tree-ssa-dom.c:2099

on ppc linux with checking disabled.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug tree-optimization/19060] [4.0 Regression] Miscompiling of if and "long long"

[andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-15 13:05 -------
Starting program: /mnt/slice1/gcc-trunk/objdir/gcc/cc1 -fpreprocessed libgcc2.i
-quiet -dumpbase libgcc2.c -auxbase-strip libgcc/./_mulvdi3.o -g -O2 -W -Wall
-Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition
-version -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -o libgcc2.s

Gives this first bt frames:

(gdb) bt full
#0  fancy_abort (
    file=0x105c0624 "/mnt/slice1/gcc-trunk/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.c", line=2099, 
    function=0x105c0980 "simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr")
    at /mnt/slice1/gcc-trunk/gcc/gcc/diagnostic.c:556
No locals.
#1  0x100e6ee0 in simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr (stmt=0x304341b8, 
    ann=0x3043b690, insert=0)
    at /mnt/slice1/gcc-trunk/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.c:2099
        tmp_high = 0x0
        tmp_low = 0x3043e360
        dummy = 0
        lowequal = 276425792
        vrp_hash_elt_p = (struct vrp_hash_elt *) 0x107bf130
        highequal = 268349012
        no_overlap = 2147479040
        cond_inverted = 0
        limit = 1
        high = 0x300217c8
        cond_high = 0x30263a60
        subset = 267452224
        vrp_records = 0x3043e360
        slot = (void **) 0x107be8c4
        low = 0x0
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
        cond_low = 0x30263a60
        swapped = 268360004
        element = (struct vrp_element *) 0x3043c400
        vrp_hash_elt = {var = 0x30434848, records = 0x0}
        op0 = 0x30434848
        op1 = 0x30263a60
        cond = 0x3042bde8
        __FUNCTION__ = "simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr"
#2  0x100e823c in eliminate_redundant_computations (walk_data=0x7ffff3e0, 
    stmt=0x304341b8, ann=0x3043b690)
    at /mnt/slice1/gcc-trunk/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.c:2571
        v_may_defs = 0x0
        expr_p = (tree *) 0x43b6a4
        def = 0x0
        insert = 0 '\0'
        cached_lhs = 0x0
        retval = 0 '\0'
        __FUNCTION__ = "eliminate_redundant_computations"

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug tree-optimization/19060] [4.0 Regression] Miscompiling of if and "long long"

[wanderer at rsu dot ru]

------- Additional Comments From wanderer at rsu dot ru  2005-01-15 13:12 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.0 Regression] Miscompiling of if and "long long"

> ------- Additional Comments From toa at pop dot agri dot ch  2005-01-15 
> 12:48 -------
> Subject: Re:  [4.0 Regression] Miscompiling of
> if and "long long"
>
> steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>> ------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 
>> 2005-01-15 12:46 -------
>> Jakub, can you please close bugs after you have commited your fixes?
>
> Do not close it, it causes bootstrap failure on ppc linux.
Are you sure?

I have bootstraped one day old gcc with this patch applyed.
But current version GCC mainline terminated with same error at FreeBSD 5.3 
(x86).
I think this patch doesn't related to bootstrap failure.

Vladimir




-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug tree-optimization/19060] [4.0 Regression] Miscompiling of if and "long long"

[jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-15 14:56 -------
I have bootstrapped the patch yesterday on
{i386,x86_64,ppc,ppc64,s390,s390x,ia64}-redhat-linux and it certainly worked.
The only change was that tree_int_cst_equal || tree_int_cst_lt -> tree_int_cst_lt
that ought to be correct.

Anyway, I'll start debugging this in ~ 2 hours.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060

[Bug tree-optimization/19060] [4.0 Regression] Miscompiling of if and "long long"

[wanderer at rsu dot ru]

------- Additional Comments From wanderer at rsu dot ru  2005-01-15 15:06 -------
> Are you sure?
I check GCC mainline (2005-01-15 09:00 GMT - before PR 19060 patch) - ./xgcc 
compile __mulvdi3 without problems
And GCC mainline (2005-01-15 09:00 GMT - after PR 19060 patch) - ./xgcc  
__mulvdi3 compilation ICE

And then PR 19060 patch create problem. :( 
Or interfere with another last day patch...

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19060