From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4538 invoked by alias); 1 Jan 2005 17:22:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4500 invoked by uid 48); 1 Jan 2005 17:22:48 -0000 Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 17:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050101172248.4499.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030616070732.11203.spigel@olvs.miee.ru> References: <20030616070732.11203.spigel@olvs.miee.ru> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug inline-asm/11203] source doesn't compile with -O0 but they compile with -O3 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-01 17:22 ------- Why do people write inline-asm like this? It is crazy to do so. Split up the inline-asm correctly. Anyone who writes like inline-asm should get what they get. For mmx inline-asm, you should be using the intrinsics instead as suggested before or just write real asm file. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11203