From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6943 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2005 12:20:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5881 invoked by uid 48); 3 Jan 2005 12:17:47 -0000 Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 12:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050103121747.5879.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040818204713.17088.jv244@cam.ac.uk> References: <20040818204713.17088.jv244@cam.ac.uk> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/17088] poor fortran optimisation at -O2/3 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00189.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-03 12:17 ------- On closer inspection this is not a new-ra bug, sorry Joost. Can you see how the numbers look for you today? Don't use new-ra, it is known to be very, very broken. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|SUSPENDED |NEW Last reconfirmed|2004-08-19 19:29:36 |2005-01-03 12:17:45 date| | Summary|[new-ra] poor optimisation |poor fortran optimisation at |at -O2/3 and -fnew-ra |-O2/3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17088