From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-124710-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25231 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2005 12:47:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25182 invoked by uid 48); 3 Jan 2005 12:47:36 -0000
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 12:47:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20050103124736.25181.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "jbeulich at novell dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20050103105200.19238.jbeulich@novell.com>
References: <20050103105200.19238.jbeulich@novell.com>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/19238] cannot change visibility of static variable in function template
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00191.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From jbeulich at novell dot com  2005-01-03 12:47 -------
I'm sorry, test case below. The expectation would be that the visibility
attribute gets inherited (as described above) from function template instances
and member functions of class template instances to their static variables.
If that conflicts with anything I can't think of right now, then the backup
solution would be to allow the attribute on such objects.

unsigned gu;

template<typename T> T test() __attribute__((__visibility__("hidden")));
template<typename T> T test() {
	static T st;

	return st = gu;
}

void test() {
	test<unsigned>();
}


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19238