public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug regression/19174] New: wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226
@ 2004-12-28 13:02 andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2004-12-28 14:29 ` [Bug regression/19174] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 more replies)
0 siblings, 16 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: andre dot maute at gmx dot de @ 2004-12-28 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
consider the following code snippet
-------- nan.cc -------
#include <iostream>
int main() {
double x = 0.55555555555555558023;
std::cout << x << " ";
std::cout << x << " ";
std::cout << std::endl;
return 0;
}
-------- nan.cc -------
> g++-4.0-20041226 -v
Using built-in specs.
Configured with: ../gcc-4.0-20041226/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-4.0-20041226
--enable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-threads=posix
--enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu --disable-nls
--program-suffix=-4.0-20041226 --with-arch=pentium3 --disable-checking
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.0 20041226 (experimental)
> g++-4.0-20041226 nan.cc
> ldd a.out
libstdc++.so.6 => /opt/gcc-4.0-20041226/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x40017000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x400fc000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /opt/gcc-4.0-20041226/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x4011f000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40129000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
> ./a.out
0.555556 nan
well this nan shouldn't be there
> g++-4.0-20041226 nan.cc -static
> ./a.out
0.555556 0.555556
> g++-4.0-20041212 -v
Reading specs from /opt/gcc-4.0-20041212/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.0/specs
Configured with: ../gcc-4.0-20041212/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-4.0-20041212
--enable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-threads=posix
--enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu --disable-nls
--program-suffix=-4.0-20041212 --with-arch=pentium3 --disable-checking
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.0 20041212 (experimental)
> g++-4.0-20041212 nan.cc
> ldd ./a.out
libstdc++.so.6 => /opt/gcc-4.0-20041212/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x40017000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x400fb000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /opt/gcc-4.0-20041212/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x4011e000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40128000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
> ./a.out
0.555556 0.555556
g++-4.0-20041212 doesn't have this problem
--
Summary: wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-
20041226
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: regression
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: andre dot maute at gmx dot de
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19174
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug regression/19174] wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226
2004-12-28 13:02 [Bug regression/19174] New: wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226 andre dot maute at gmx dot de
@ 2004-12-28 14:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-28 17:21 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-28 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28 14:29 -------
I cannot reproduce this on powerpc-darwin.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|critical |normal
Summary|wrong code regression or |wrong code regression or
|library problem in gcc-4.0- |library problem in gcc-4.0-
|20041226 |20041226
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19174
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug regression/19174] wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226
2004-12-28 13:02 [Bug regression/19174] New: wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226 andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2004-12-28 14:29 ` [Bug regression/19174] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-28 17:21 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2004-12-28 18:03 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: andre dot maute at gmx dot de @ 2004-12-28 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From andre dot maute at gmx dot de 2004-12-28 17:21 -------
Oh i forgot my system triplets, they are all
i686-pc-linux-gnu
g++-4.0-20041226 -v
doesn't show the triplet any more, there is only a line
Using built-in specs.
i suggest to remove this new feature for convenience.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19174
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug regression/19174] wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226
2004-12-28 13:02 [Bug regression/19174] New: wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226 andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2004-12-28 14:29 ` [Bug regression/19174] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-28 17:21 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
@ 2004-12-28 18:03 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2004-12-29 0:42 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: andre dot maute at gmx dot de @ 2004-12-28 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From andre dot maute at gmx dot de 2004-12-28 18:03 -------
it looks like it is really a library problem. Using the libraries from
gcc-4.0-20041212
everything is fine, although nan.cc was nevertheless compiled with
gcc-4.0-20041226.
> ldd a.out
libstdc++.so.6 => /opt/gcc-4.0-20041212/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x40017000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x400fb000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /opt/gcc-4.0-20041212/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x4011e000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40128000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
> ./a.out
0.555556 0.555556
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19174
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug regression/19174] wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226
2004-12-28 13:02 [Bug regression/19174] New: wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226 andre dot maute at gmx dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-12-28 18:03 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
@ 2004-12-29 0:42 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-29 11:14 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-29 0:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-29 00:42 -------
I don't reproduce this with a build from last night.
Try again with today's sources. In particular, the symptom looks as if the
fpu has been put into mmx mode. Which might be solved with
2004-12-27 Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
* config/i386/i386.h (UNITS_PER_SIMD_WORD): Don't use MMX/3DNOW.
2004-12-26 Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
* config/i386/i386.md (mov<MMXMODEI>_internal_rex64): New.
(movv2sf_internal_rex64): New.
(mov<MMXMODEI>_internal): Use no register preferences at all.
(movv2sf_internal): Likewise.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
GCC target triplet| |i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19174
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug regression/19174] wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226
2004-12-28 13:02 [Bug regression/19174] New: wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226 andre dot maute at gmx dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-12-29 0:42 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-29 11:14 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2005-01-01 23:58 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: andre dot maute at gmx dot de @ 2004-12-29 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From andre dot maute at gmx dot de 2004-12-29 11:14 -------
Sorry no cvs available, and only a modem dial-up connection,
i'll try it when the new snapshot diff is available.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19174
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug regression/19174] wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226
2004-12-28 13:02 [Bug regression/19174] New: wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226 andre dot maute at gmx dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-12-29 11:14 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
@ 2005-01-01 23:58 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2005-01-02 21:06 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: andre dot maute at gmx dot de @ 2005-01-01 23:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From andre dot maute at gmx dot de 2005-01-01 23:58 -------
if i remove the architecture option from the configure parameters
> g++-4.0-20041226-na -v
Using built-in specs.
Configured with: ../gcc-4.0-20041226/configure
--prefix=/opt/gcc-4.0-20041226-na--enable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++
--enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu
--disable-nls --program-suffix=-4.0-20041226-na --disable-checking
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.0 20041226 (experimental)
> g++-4.0-20041226-na nan.cc
> ./a.out
0.555556 0.555556
> g++-4.0-20041226-na nan.cc -march=pentium3
> ./a.out
0.555556 0.555556
is this mysterious? because now everything looks o.k.
for compilation of gcc-4.0-20041226 i used gcc-4.0-20041212.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19174
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug regression/19174] wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226
2004-12-28 13:02 [Bug regression/19174] New: wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226 andre dot maute at gmx dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-01 23:58 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
@ 2005-01-02 21:06 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2005-01-02 23:44 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: andre dot maute at gmx dot de @ 2005-01-02 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From andre dot maute at gmx dot de 2005-01-02 21:06 -------
well i've tested gcc-4.0-20050102, (compiled with gcc-4.0-20041212)
> g++-4.0-20050102 -v
Using built-in specs.
Configured with: ../gcc-4.0-20050102/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-4.0-20050102
--enable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-threads=posix
--enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu --disable-nls
--program-suffix=-4.0-20050102 --with-arch=pentium3 --disable-checking
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.0 20050102 (experimental)
> g++-4.0-20050102 nan.cc
> ./a.out
0.555556 nan
the problem is still there
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19174
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug regression/19174] wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226
2004-12-28 13:02 [Bug regression/19174] New: wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226 andre dot maute at gmx dot de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-02 21:06 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
@ 2005-01-02 23:44 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2005-01-04 0:03 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: andre dot maute at gmx dot de @ 2005-01-02 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From andre dot maute at gmx dot de 2005-01-02 23:44 -------
the C-version works with every compiler
------------ nan.c -----------
#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
double x = 0.55555555555555558023;
printf( "%f ", x );
printf( "%f ", x );
printf( "\n" );
return 0;
}
------------ nan.c -----------
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19174
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug regression/19174] wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226
2004-12-28 13:02 [Bug regression/19174] New: wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226 andre dot maute at gmx dot de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-02 23:44 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
@ 2005-01-04 0:03 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-04 17:46 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-04 0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-04 00:03 -------
I'm willing to lay money this is the same problem as PR 19235.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19235 ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19174
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug regression/19174] wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226
2004-12-28 13:02 [Bug regression/19174] New: wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226 andre dot maute at gmx dot de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-04 0:03 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-04 17:46 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2005-01-10 0:00 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: andre dot maute at gmx dot de @ 2005-01-04 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From andre dot maute at gmx dot de 2005-01-04 17:46 -------
tried gcc-4.0-20050102 with the patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386.md.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.597&r2=1.598
from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19235
and the problem still does occur :-(
P.S.: compiled with gcc-4.0-20041212
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|DUPLICATE |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19174
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug regression/19174] wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226
2004-12-28 13:02 [Bug regression/19174] New: wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226 andre dot maute at gmx dot de
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-04 17:46 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
@ 2005-01-10 0:00 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2005-01-17 12:28 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: andre dot maute at gmx dot de @ 2005-01-10 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From andre dot maute at gmx dot de 2005-01-10 00:00 -------
tried gcc-4.0-20050109 compile with gcc-3.4.3
the problem still appears
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19174
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug regression/19174] wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226
2004-12-28 13:02 [Bug regression/19174] New: wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226 andre dot maute at gmx dot de
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-10 0:00 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
@ 2005-01-17 12:28 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2005-01-19 21:22 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: andre dot maute at gmx dot de @ 2005-01-17 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From andre dot maute at gmx dot de 2005-01-17 12:28 -------
gcc-4.0-20050116 compiled with gcc-3.3.5 this time
with the configure parameter: --with-arch=pentium3
fails
withOUT the configure parameter: --with-arch=pentium3
everything is o.k.
with respect to the library things i mentionend, is it possible that
libstdc++.so
is miscompiled, when the above configure parameter is used.?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19174
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug regression/19174] wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226
2004-12-28 13:02 [Bug regression/19174] New: wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226 andre dot maute at gmx dot de
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-17 12:28 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
@ 2005-01-19 21:22 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-20 6:59 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-19 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 21:21 -------
Yes, it's certainly possible. But indeed pr19511 shows that you can't even get
that far with --with-arch=pentium3 at the moment, due to changes that post-date
this report.
After I get a fix for that problem, will you please re-test? Hopefully I'll
have magically fixed this problem which was never sufficiently isolated...
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |19511
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19174
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug regression/19174] wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226
2004-12-28 13:02 [Bug regression/19174] New: wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226 andre dot maute at gmx dot de
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-19 21:22 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-20 6:59 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-24 10:42 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2005-01-24 13:30 ` [Bug regression/19174] [4.0 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-20 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
Bug 19174 depends on bug 19511, which changed state.
Bug 19511 Summary: [4.0 Regression] ICE in in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:391
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19511
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19174
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug regression/19174] wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226
2004-12-28 13:02 [Bug regression/19174] New: wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226 andre dot maute at gmx dot de
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-20 6:59 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-24 10:42 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2005-01-24 13:30 ` [Bug regression/19174] [4.0 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: andre dot maute at gmx dot de @ 2005-01-24 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From andre dot maute at gmx dot de 2005-01-24 10:42 -------
It looks like it is fixed now
Compiling gcc-4.0-20050123 with a gcc-4.0-20050116, which has the architecture
option disabled, works. Great!
Regards Andre
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19174
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug regression/19174] [4.0 Regression] wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226
2004-12-28 13:02 [Bug regression/19174] New: wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226 andre dot maute at gmx dot de
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-24 10:42 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
@ 2005-01-24 13:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-24 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-24 13:29 -------
Fixed so lets close it.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Keywords| |wrong-code
Resolution| |FIXED
Summary|wrong code regression or |[4.0 Regression] wrong code
|library problem in gcc-4.0- |regression or library
|20041226 |problem in gcc-4.0-20041226
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19174
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-01-24 13:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-12-28 13:02 [Bug regression/19174] New: wrong code regression or library problem in gcc-4.0-20041226 andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2004-12-28 14:29 ` [Bug regression/19174] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-28 17:21 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2004-12-28 18:03 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2004-12-29 0:42 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-29 11:14 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2005-01-01 23:58 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2005-01-02 21:06 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2005-01-02 23:44 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2005-01-04 0:03 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-04 17:46 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2005-01-10 0:00 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2005-01-17 12:28 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2005-01-19 21:22 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-20 6:59 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-24 10:42 ` andre dot maute at gmx dot de
2005-01-24 13:30 ` [Bug regression/19174] [4.0 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).