public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/18308] New: ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274
@ 2004-11-05 13:01 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-11-05 13:25 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18308] " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (14 more replies)
  0 siblings, 15 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-11-05 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

The following code snippet causes an ICE on mainline when compiled with
"-O -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops":

=============================
void foo();

void bar()
{
    int i, j, k=0;

    for (i=0; i<2; ++i)
        if (j) k=2;

    if (k) foo();
}
=============================

bug.c: In function 'bar':
bug.c:4: internal compiler error: in do_jump, at dojump.c:274
Please submit a full bug report, [etc.]

Phil's regression hunter says:
: Search converges between 2004-10-01-014001-trunk (#570) and
2004-10-01-161002-trunk (#571).

-- 
           Summary: ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, monitored
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18308


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/18308] ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274
  2004-11-05 13:01 [Bug tree-optimization/18308] New: ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-11-05 13:25 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-11-05 13:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-11-05 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-11-05 13:25 -------
Zdenek, the problem appeared with your patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-10/msg00030.html


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18308


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/18308] ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274
  2004-11-05 13:01 [Bug tree-optimization/18308] New: ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-11-05 13:25 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18308] " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-11-05 13:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-11-18  1:27 ` dpatel at apple dot com
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-11-05 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-11-05 13:51 -------
ifcvt produces non-gimple:
  _ifc_.2_15 = (j_6 != 0 || !_ifc_.1_16) && ivtmp.0_4 != 0;

Confirmed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dpatel at apple dot com
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2004-11-05 13:51:36
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18308


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/18308] ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274
  2004-11-05 13:01 [Bug tree-optimization/18308] New: ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-11-05 13:25 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18308] " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-11-05 13:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-11-18  1:27 ` dpatel at apple dot com
  2004-11-18  1:28 ` dpatel at apple dot com
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: dpatel at apple dot com @ 2004-11-18  1:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From dpatel at apple dot com  2004-11-18 01:27 -------
Bigger issue is : if-convert COND_EXPR is not vectorized and do_jump() does not aborts().

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18308


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/18308] ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274
  2004-11-05 13:01 [Bug tree-optimization/18308] New: ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-11-18  1:27 ` dpatel at apple dot com
@ 2004-11-18  1:28 ` dpatel at apple dot com
  2004-11-18  2:26 ` dpatel at apple dot com
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: dpatel at apple dot com @ 2004-11-18  1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From dpatel at apple dot com  2004-11-18 01:28 -------
I meant,

Bigger issue is : if-convert COND_EXPR is not vectorized and do_jump() does not handle it.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18308


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/18308] ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274
  2004-11-05 13:01 [Bug tree-optimization/18308] New: ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-11-18  1:28 ` dpatel at apple dot com
@ 2004-11-18  2:26 ` dpatel at apple dot com
  2004-11-18  2:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: dpatel at apple dot com @ 2004-11-18  2:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From dpatel at apple dot com  2004-11-18 02:26 -------
After I update tree-level if-conversion to force gimple operands appropriately, rewrite_out_of_ssa() is 
converting following ...

bar()                                                                                                                                     
{                                                                                                                                           
  _Bool _ifc_.3;                                                                                                                            
  _Bool _ifc_.2;                                                                                                                            
  _Bool D.1339;                                                                                                                             
  _Bool D.1336;                                                                                                                             
  _Bool D.1337;                                                                                                                             
  _Bool D.1338;                                                                                                                             
  _Bool _ifc_.1;                                                                                                                            
  unsigned int ivtmp.0;                                                                                                                     
  int k;                                                                                                                                    
  int j;                                                                                                                                    
  int i;                                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                            
  # BLOCK 0                                                                                                                                 
  # PRED: ENTRY [100.0%]  (fallthru,exec)                                                                                                   
  k_21 = j_6 != 0 ? 2 : 0;                                                                                                                  
  k_5 = j_6 == 0 ? k_21 : 2;                                                                                                                
  if (k_5 != 0) goto <L5>; else goto <L6>;                                                                                                  
  # SUCC: 1 [46.5%]  (true,exec) 2 [53.5%]  (false,exec)                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                            
  # BLOCK 1                                                                                                                                 
  # PRED: 0 [46.5%]  (true,exec)                                                                                                            
<L5>:;                                                                                                                                      
  #   .GLOBAL_VAR_10 = V_MAY_DEF <.GLOBAL_VAR_9>;                                                                                           
  foo () [tail call];                                                                                                                       
  # SUCC: 2 [100.0%]  (fallthru,exec)                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                            
  # BLOCK 2                                                                                                                                 
  # PRED: 0 [53.5%]  (false,exec) 1 [100.0%]  (fallthru,exec)                                                                               
<L6>:;                                                                                                                                      
  return;                                                                                                                                   
  # SUCC: EXIT [100.0%]                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                            
}                                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                            

into ...

bar ()                                                                                                                                      
{                                                                                                                                           
  int k.17;                                                                                                                                 
  _Bool _ifc_.3;                                                                                                                            
  _Bool _ifc_.2;                                                                                                                            
  _Bool D.1339;                                                                                                                             
  _Bool D.1336;                                                                                                                             
  _Bool D.1337;                                                                                                                             
  _Bool D.1338;                                                                                                                             
  _Bool _ifc_.1;                                                                                                                            
  unsigned int ivtmp.0;                                                                                                                     
  int k;                                                                                                                                    
  int j;                                                                                                                                    
  int i;                                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                            
  # BLOCK 0                                                                                                                                 
  # PRED: ENTRY [100.0%]  (fallthru,exec)                                                                                                   
  if ((j == 0 ? j != 0 ? 2 : 0 : 2) != 0) goto <L5>; else goto <L6>;                                                                        
  # SUCC: 1 [46.5%]  (true,exec) 2 [53.5%]  (false,exec)                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                            
  # BLOCK 1                                                                                                                                 
  # PRED: 0 [46.5%]  (true,exec)                                                                                                            
<L5>:;                                                                                                                                      
  #   .GLOBAL_VAR_10 = V_MAY_DEF <.GLOBAL_VAR_9>;                                                                                           
  foo () [tail call];                                                                                                                       
  # SUCC: 2 [100.0%]  (fallthru,exec)                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                            
  # BLOCK 2                                                                                                                                 
  # PRED: 0 [53.5%]  (false,exec) 1 [100.0%]  (fallthru,exec)                                                                               
<L6>:;                                                                                                                                      
  return;                                                                                                                                   
  # SUCC: EXIT [100.0%]                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                            
}

                                                  

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18308


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/18308] ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274
  2004-11-05 13:01 [Bug tree-optimization/18308] New: ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-11-18  2:26 ` dpatel at apple dot com
@ 2004-11-18  2:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-11-18  2:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-11-18  2:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-11-18 02:29 -------
So someone removed too much from do_jump in the first place.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18308


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/18308] ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274
  2004-11-05 13:01 [Bug tree-optimization/18308] New: ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-11-18  2:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-11-18  2:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-11-18  2:34 ` dpatel at apple dot com
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-11-18  2:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-11-18 02:31 -------
And that would mean it was caused by:
        * dojump.c (do_jump) <COND_EXPR, EQ_EXPR, NE_EXPR,
        TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR, TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR, COMPOUND_EXPR>:
        Abort on gimplified cases.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bonzini at gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18308


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/18308] ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274
  2004-11-05 13:01 [Bug tree-optimization/18308] New: ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-11-18  2:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-11-18  2:34 ` dpatel at apple dot com
  2004-11-18  8:04 ` paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: dpatel at apple dot com @ 2004-11-18  2:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From dpatel at apple dot com  2004-11-18 02:33 -------
Subject: Re:  ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274

Andrew,

You can try following to fix tree level if-conversion. I have not 
tested it completely yet.

-
Devang

Index: tree-if-conv.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/tree-if-conv.c,v
retrieving revision 2.19
diff -Idpatel.pbxuser -c -3 -p -r2.19 tree-if-conv.c
*** tree-if-conv.c      16 Nov 2004 20:02:48 -0000      2.19
--- tree-if-conv.c      18 Nov 2004 02:32:03 -0000
*************** add_to_dst_predicate_list (struct loop *
*** 639,645 ****
       new_cond = unshare_expr (cond);
     else
       {
!       tree tmp_stmt;
         /* new_cond == prev_cond AND cond */
         tree tmp = build (TRUTH_AND_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
                         unshare_expr (prev_cond), cond);
--- 639,655 ----
       new_cond = unshare_expr (cond);
     else
       {
!       tree tmp_stmt = NULL_TREE;
!       tree tmp_stmts1 = NULL_TREE;
!       tree tmp_stmts2 = NULL_TREE;
!       prev_cond = force_gimple_operand (unshare_expr (prev_cond), 
&tmp_stmts1, true, NULL);
!       if (tmp_stmts1)
!       bsi_insert_before (bsi, tmp_stmts1, BSI_SAME_STMT);
!
!       cond = force_gimple_operand (unshare_expr (cond), &tmp_stmts2, 
true, NULL);
!       if (tmp_stmts2)
!       bsi_insert_before (bsi, tmp_stmts2, BSI_SAME_STMT);
!
         /* new_cond == prev_cond AND cond */
         tree tmp = build (TRUTH_AND_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
                         unshare_expr (prev_cond), cond);



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18308


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/18308] ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274
  2004-11-05 13:01 [Bug tree-optimization/18308] New: ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-11-18  2:34 ` dpatel at apple dot com
@ 2004-11-18  8:04 ` paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch
  2004-11-18 19:09 ` dpatel at apple dot com
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch @ 2004-11-18  8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch  2004-11-18 08:03 -------
Subject: Re:  ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274

> And that would mean it was caused by:
>         * dojump.c (do_jump) <COND_EXPR, EQ_EXPR, NE_EXPR,
>         TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR, TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR, COMPOUND_EXPR>:
>         Abort on gimplified cases.

While I can work on a fix, those COND_EXPR were *not* valid GIMPLE at 
the time the patch was written.

Paolo


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18308


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/18308] ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274
  2004-11-05 13:01 [Bug tree-optimization/18308] New: ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-11-18  8:04 ` paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch
@ 2004-11-18 19:09 ` dpatel at apple dot com
  2004-12-28 17:44 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: dpatel at apple dot com @ 2004-11-18 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From dpatel at apple dot com  2004-11-18 19:09 -------
Subject: Re:  ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274


On Nov 18, 2004, at 12:03 AM, paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch 
wrote:

> While I can work on a fix, those COND_EXPR were *not* valid GIMPLE at
> the time the patch was written.

I agree with you. While cleanup this stuff, you even cc'ed us and left 
some stuff around. May be we can update rewrite_outof_ssa()? See 
example I included above.

-
Devang



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18308


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/18308] ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274
  2004-11-05 13:01 [Bug tree-optimization/18308] New: ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-11-18 19:09 ` dpatel at apple dot com
@ 2004-12-28 17:44 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-12-28 17:45 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-28 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-28 17:44 -------
Looking at it.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18308


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/18308] ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274
  2004-11-05 13:01 [Bug tree-optimization/18308] New: ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-12-28 17:44 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-28 17:45 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-12-28 18:50 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-28 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |dot org                     |org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2004-11-05 13:51:36         |2004-12-28 17:45:12
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18308


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/18308] ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274
  2004-11-05 13:01 [Bug tree-optimization/18308] New: ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-12-28 17:45 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-28 18:50 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-04 14:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-04 15:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-28 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-28 18:49 -------
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg02012.html

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |patch


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18308


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/18308] ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274
  2004-11-05 13:01 [Bug tree-optimization/18308] New: ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-12-28 18:50 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-04 14:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-04 15:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-04 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-04 14:37 -------
Subject: Bug 18308

CVSROOT:	/cvs/gcc
Module name:	gcc
Changes by:	bonzini@gcc.gnu.org	2005-01-04 14:37:24

Modified files:
	gcc            : ChangeLog tree-if-conv.c dojump.c 
	gcc/testsuite  : ChangeLog 
Added files:
	gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect: pr18308.c 

Log message:
	gcc:
	2005-01-04  Paolo Bonzini  <bonzini@gnu.org>
	Devang Patel  <dpatel@apple.com>
	
	PR tree-optimization/18308
	
	* tree-if-conv.c (add_to_dst_predicate_list): Gimplify
	the operands before creating a new expression.
	* dojump.c (do_jump): Make drop_through_label available
	for all cases.  Add expansion of COND_EXPR.
	
	gcc/testsuite:
	2005-01-04  Paolo Bonzini  <bonzini@gnu.org>
	
	* gcc.dg/vect/pr18308.c: New testcase.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.7019&r2=2.7020
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/tree-if-conv.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.24&r2=2.25
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/dojump.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.35&r2=1.36
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4844&r2=1.4845
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr18308.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18308


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/18308] ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274
  2004-11-05 13:01 [Bug tree-optimization/18308] New: ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-04 14:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-04 15:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-04 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-04 15:43 -------
Fixed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.0.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18308


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-01-04 15:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-11-05 13:01 [Bug tree-optimization/18308] New: ICE in do_jump, at dojump.c:274 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-05 13:25 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18308] " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-05 13:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-18  1:27 ` dpatel at apple dot com
2004-11-18  1:28 ` dpatel at apple dot com
2004-11-18  2:26 ` dpatel at apple dot com
2004-11-18  2:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-18  2:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-18  2:34 ` dpatel at apple dot com
2004-11-18  8:04 ` paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch
2004-11-18 19:09 ` dpatel at apple dot com
2004-12-28 17:44 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-28 17:45 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-28 18:50 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-04 14:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-04 15:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).