public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/18566] Can vary constants (undefined fortran)
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 03:44:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050105034419.9507.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041119132256.18566.Thomas.Koenig@online.de>


------- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-05 03:44 -------
This question was asked and mostly answered on the gcc mailing list.
    http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-12/msg00231.html
    http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-12/msg00234.html

As per the ABI, small local data ("own" data) is placed in the small data
section in the GOT, where it can be accessed with a single memory reference.  If
we put it in the read-only data section, it would require two memory references
to access it, resulting in slower code.

Since the C testcase is invalid, this is not a good enough reason to disable an
optimization by default.

However, as Richard Henderson mentioned, we could optionally put the variable in
a read-only data section if the user requested it via an option, or if the
Fortran standard requires it.  I don't know if the Fortran standard requires
this, I doubt that it does.

Incidentally, this issue is not unique to the IA-64 port.  There are other
targets that behave the same way, mips-elf for instance.  So you may still have
this problem when porting code to other systems even if the IA-64 port was fixed.

There is an option that will make your testcase work as you expect, the
-mno-sdata option.  This is overkill for your purposes though, as this prevents
any variable from going in sdata, whereas you only want to prevent putting const
variables in sdata.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |wilson at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18566


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-01-05  3:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-19 13:23 [Bug fortran/18566] New: Can vary constants Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2004-11-19 15:13 ` [Bug fortran/18566] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-25 20:29 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2004-11-29 14:13 ` [Bug target/18566] Can vary constants (undefined fortran) pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-30  8:29 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2004-12-07 18:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-05  3:44 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
     [not found] <bug-18566-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2013-03-17 17:08 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050105034419.9507.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).