From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24205 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2005 14:49:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19987 invoked by uid 48); 6 Jan 2005 14:46:22 -0000 Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050106144622.19986.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050106084006.19288.jean-pierre.chevallet@imag.fr> References: <20050106084006.19288.jean-pierre.chevallet@imag.fr> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/19288] No more possible to have a template function that uses a nested class of a template class X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00679.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-01-06 14:46 ------- Giving explicit template arguments for template operators works the same way: write x.operator<< (abc) instead of x << abc As for the evolution of C++: it isn't C++ but rather gcc that is evolving. The standard for C++ was finished in 1998, and since then gcc has just tried to be more standards conformant. gcc3.4 was a big step forward in this respect. W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19288