From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15877 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2005 16:11:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15852 invoked by uid 48); 6 Jan 2005 16:11:45 -0000 Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050106161145.15849.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040713055437.16511.billingd@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040713055437.16511.billingd@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/16511] Test 19990905-0.f fails with gfortran X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00703.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-06 16:11 ------- (In reply to comment #9) > However, the inital (comment #0) snippet compiles fine on all compilers > mentionned above. So I guess the common block as something to do with it. Indeed, the common block makes this code legal, the code in #9 is rightfully rejected by gfortran. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16511