From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21221 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2005 20:01:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20903 invoked by uid 48); 6 Jan 2005 20:01:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 20:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050106200101.20902.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050106193737.19297.rwgk@yahoo.com> References: <20050106193737.19297.rwgk@yahoo.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/19297] [4.0 Regression] rejects valid code when compiling Boost.Python test X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00747.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-06 20:01 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > ------- Additional Comment #2 From Andrew Pinski 2005-01-06 19:45 [reply] ---- > --- > > Looks like there are two bugs here ... > > I've opened another bug report for the second error: Oh, then lets close this as a dup of the new bug which I just opened for the ICE, PR 19299. Sorry about that I did not know you would be so kind to split them up. Ok, next up reducing 19298 then. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19299 *** -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19297