public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/19283] New: Bad code generated in final_cleanup
@ 2005-01-05 23:49 gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-06 0:27 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19283] [4.0 Regression] " belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-05 23:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
g++ generates bad code for the program below if -O3 is used.
If optimization is off, it works correctly.
$ g++ -o x x.cc
$ ./x
$ g++ -o x x.cc -O3
$ ./x
fail
$
Here is the generated code for main() (with exception-handling labels elided):
main:
pushl %ebp
movl %esp, %ebp
subl $8, %esp
andl $-16, %esp
subl $16, %esp
movl $.LC0, (%esp)
call puts
xorl %eax, %eax
leave
ret
The test has been erroneously optimized out.
Here's main() from x.cc.t66.blocks:
int main() ()
{
<bb 0>:
if ((short int) (short unsigned int) (int) (short unsigned int) rawdata < 0) goto <L1>; else goto <L2>;
<L1>:;
printf (&"fail\n"[0]);
<L2>:;
return 0;
}
This looks ok.
And here it is from x.cc.t67.final_cleanup:
;; Function int main() (main)
Merging blocks 0 and 1
Merging blocks 0 and 2
int main() ()
{
<bb 0>:
printf (&"fail\n"[0]);
return 0;
}
Where the test is gone.
So the problem is in this step.
This looks like it may be related to the previous bug
tree-optimization/18576. However, that one is classified
as missed-optimization, while this is wrong code.
Environment:
System: Linux karma 2.6.8.1 #20 Mon Sep 13 23:48:47 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Architecture: i686
<machine, os, target, libraries (multiple lines)>
host: i686-pc-linux-gnu
build: i686-pc-linux-gnu
target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
configured with: /home/sss/gcc/gcc/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc --enable-threads=posix --enable-long-long --enable-languages=c,c++,f95
How-To-Repeat:
Compile the following with -O3:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
extern "C" int printf (const char*, ...);
unsigned short int foo(unsigned int* ptr) {
return *ptr;
};
unsigned rawdata = 0;
int main ()
{
if ((foo(&rawdata) & 0x8000) != 0)
printf ("fail\n");
return 0;
}
-------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional Comments From snyder at fnal dot gov 2005-01-05 23:49 -------
Fix:
<how to correct or work around the problem, if known (multiple lines)>
--
Summary: Bad code generated in final_cleanup
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: snyder at fnal dot gov
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19283
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19283] [4.0 Regression] Bad code generated in final_cleanup
2005-01-05 23:49 [Bug tree-optimization/19283] New: Bad code generated in final_cleanup gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-06 0:27 ` belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
2005-01-06 0:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru @ 2005-01-06 0:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru 2005-01-06 00:27 -------
// C testcase, use '-O2' or '-O1 -funit-at-a-time' to reproduce:
void abort (void);
static unsigned short foo (unsigned int* p)
{
return *p;
};
unsigned int u;
int main ()
{
if ((foo (&u) & 0x8000) != 0)
abort ();
return 0;
}
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
GCC build triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu |
GCC host triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu |
GCC target triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu |
Keywords| |wrong-code
Known to fail| |4.0.0
Known to work| |3.4.4
Priority|P3 |P1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-01-06 00:27:06
date| |
Summary|Bad code generated in |[4.0 Regression] Bad code
|final_cleanup |generated in final_cleanup
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19283
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19283] [4.0 Regression] Bad code generated in final_cleanup
2005-01-05 23:49 [Bug tree-optimization/19283] New: Bad code generated in final_cleanup gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-06 0:27 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19283] [4.0 Regression] " belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
@ 2005-01-06 0:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-06 15:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-06 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-06 00:28 -------
Hmm, this is fold f'ing up again.
Here is an example for -O1:
void abort (void);
static inline unsigned short foo (unsigned int* p)
{
return *p;
};
unsigned int u;
int main ()
{
if ((foo (&u) & 0x8000) != 0)
abort ();
return 0;
}
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19283
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19283] [4.0 Regression] Bad code generated in final_cleanup
2005-01-05 23:49 [Bug tree-optimization/19283] New: Bad code generated in final_cleanup gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-06 0:27 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19283] [4.0 Regression] " belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
2005-01-06 0:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-06 15:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-06 16:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-06 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-06 15:52 -------
Yeah, this is fold_widened_comparison "optimizing":
(short intD.7) (short unsigned intD.8) (intD.0) (short unsigned intD.8) uD.1124 <
0
into 1 (for unsigned int uD.1124).
get_unwidened returns (unsigned short) uD.1124 (note different sign; and that
seems to be what get_unwidened documents:
If we have not stripped any zero-extensions (uns is 0), we can strip any kind of
extension.).
But I guess fold_widened_comparison relies on shorter_type really being a shorter
type. Will look into this further.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2005-01-06 00:27:06 |2005-01-06 15:52:31
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19283
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19283] [4.0 Regression] Bad code generated in final_cleanup
2005-01-05 23:49 [Bug tree-optimization/19283] New: Bad code generated in final_cleanup gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-06 15:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-06 16:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-07 9:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-07 13:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-06 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-06 16:56 -------
Patch here: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg00344.html>..
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19283
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19283] [4.0 Regression] Bad code generated in final_cleanup
2005-01-05 23:49 [Bug tree-optimization/19283] New: Bad code generated in final_cleanup gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-06 16:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-07 9:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-07 13:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-07 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-07 09:08 -------
Subject: Bug 19283
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: jakub@gcc.gnu.org 2005-01-07 09:08:11
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog fold-const.c
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute: 20050106-1.c
Log message:
PR tree-optimization/19283
* fold-const.c (fold_widened_comparison): Return NULL if shorter_type
is not shorter than the original type.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/20050106-1.c: New test.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.7057&r2=2.7058
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fold-const.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.490&r2=1.491
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4862&r2=1.4863
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20050106-1.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19283
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19283] [4.0 Regression] Bad code generated in final_cleanup
2005-01-05 23:49 [Bug tree-optimization/19283] New: Bad code generated in final_cleanup gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-07 9:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-07 13:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-07 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-07 13:49 -------
Fixed thanks Jakub.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19283
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-01-07 13:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-01-05 23:49 [Bug tree-optimization/19283] New: Bad code generated in final_cleanup gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-06 0:27 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19283] [4.0 Regression] " belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
2005-01-06 0:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-06 15:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-06 16:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-07 9:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-07 13:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).