public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux
@ 2005-01-06 19:55 christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-06 19:56 ` [Bug other/19300] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (28 more replies)
0 siblings, 29 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com @ 2005-01-06 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Aurora SPARC Linux Corona (FC3-ish) UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u:
binutils-2.15.92.0.2-5 - sparc
bison-1.875c-2 - sparc
dejagnu-1.4.4-1 - noarch
expect-5.42.1-1 - sparc
gcc-3.4.2-6.fc3 - sparc
gcc4-4.0.0-0.8sparc - sparc
glibc-2.3.3-99 - sparcv9
glibc-2.3.3-99 - sparc64
glibc-headers-2.3.3-99 - sparc64
glibc-kernheaders-2.6-17sparc - sparc
kernel-2.6.8-1.571sp1 - sparc64
kernel-2.6.9-1.1032sp1 - sparc64
package kernel-smp is not installed
make-3.80-3 - sparc
nptl-devel-2.3.3-99 - sparcv9
tcl-8.4.5-7 - sparc
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Jan 5 07:59:46 UTC 2005
test results posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-01/msg00244.html
from the c++ testsuite logfile:
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/testsuite/../g++
-B/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/testsuite/../ ./wchar-1.H -nostdinc++
-I/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/sparc-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/sparc-linux
-I/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/sparc-linux/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++
-I/usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/backward
-I/usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite -fmessage-length=0 -g -o
wchar-1.H.gch (timeout = 1200)
PASS: ./wchar-1.H -g (test for excess errors)
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/testsuite/../g++
-B/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/testsuite/../
/usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pch/wchar-1.C -nostdinc++
-I/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/sparc-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/sparc-linux
-I/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/sparc-linux/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++
-I/usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/backward
-I/usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite -fmessage-length=0 -g -I. -S
-o wchar-1.s (timeout = 1200)
/usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pch/wchar-1.C:1: fatal error: had
to relocate PCH
compilation terminated.
compiler exited with status 1
output is:
/usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pch/wchar-1.C:1: fatal error: had
to relocate PCH
compilation terminated.
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/wchar-1.C -g (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pch/wchar-1.C:1: fatal error: had
to relocate PCH
compilation terminated.
UNTESTED: g++.dg/pch/wchar-1.C -g assembly comparison
--
Summary: PCH failuers on sparc-linux
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/19300] PCH failuers on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
@ 2005-01-06 19:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-06 20:17 ` [Bug other/19300] PCH failures " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (27 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-06 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-06 19:56 -------
This is only host related and nothing else.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|c++ |other
GCC build triplet|sparc-unknown-linux-gnu |
GCC target triplet|sparc-unknown-linux-gnu |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/19300] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-06 19:56 ` [Bug other/19300] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-06 20:17 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-06 20:20 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (26 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-06 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|PCH failuers on sparc-linux |PCH failures on sparc-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/19300] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-06 19:56 ` [Bug other/19300] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-06 20:17 ` [Bug other/19300] PCH failures " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-06 20:20 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-07 11:03 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (25 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-06 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-06 20:20 -------
Do you know if the tests pass with GCC 3.4.x?
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/19300] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-06 20:20 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-07 11:03 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-07 11:13 ` [Bug other/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (24 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com @ 2005-01-07 11:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-01-07 11:03 -------
well, running this:
# sparc32 ./gcc/contrib/test_installed --without-gcc --without-g77 --without-objc
I get this:
Running /usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pch/pch.exp ...
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/wchar-1.C -g assembly comparison
Running /usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/special/ecos.exp ...
The rest of the pch tests are fine, so, it's a regression I'd say.
Oh, this is with gcc version 3.4.2 20041017 (Red Hat 3.4.2-6.fc3)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-07 11:03 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
@ 2005-01-07 11:13 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-07 13:52 ` [Bug other/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (23 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-07 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|PCH failures on sparc-linux |[4.0 Regression] PCH
| |failures
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-07 11:13 ` [Bug other/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-07 13:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-07 18:05 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (22 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-07 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-07 13:52 -------
Does large test fail with 3.4.x, if so then this is not really a regression except for PCH size.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.0 Regression] PCH |[4.0 Regression] PCH
|failures |failures on sparc-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-07 13:52 ` [Bug other/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-07 18:05 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-07 19:21 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (21 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com @ 2005-01-07 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-01-07 18:05 -------
well, I can't find the large test in the c++ pch testsuite. And, from the test
results posted here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-01/msg00244.html
I can't tell if the largefile test in the c pch testsuite fails or not.
new test results are on the way. stay tuned
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-07 18:05 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
@ 2005-01-07 19:21 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-07 19:23 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (20 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com @ 2005-01-07 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-01-07 19:21 -------
This is what I find about largefile in the c testsuite:
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ ./largefile.h -O0 -g -o largefile.h.gch
(timeout = 1200)
PASS: ./largefile.h -O0 -g (test for excess errors)
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ largefile.c -O0 -g -I. -S -o largefile.s
(timeout = 1200)
PASS: largefile.c -O0 -g (test for excess errors)
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ largefile.c -O0 -g -I. -S -o largefile.s
(timeout = 1200)
PASS: largefile.c -O0 -g (test for excess errors)
PASS: gcc.dg/pch/largefile.c -O0 -g assembly comparison
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ ./largefile.h -O0 -o largefile.h.gch
(timeout = 1200)
PASS: ./largefile.h -O0 (test for excess errors)
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ largefile.c -O0 -I. -S -o largefile.s
(timeout = 1200)
PASS: largefile.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ largefile.c -O0 -I. -S -o largefile.s
(timeout = 1200)
PASS: largefile.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
PASS: gcc.dg/pch/largefile.c -O0 assembly comparison
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ ./largefile.h -O1 -o largefile.h.gch
(timeout = 1200)
PASS: ./largefile.h -O1 (test for excess errors)
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ largefile.c -O1 -I. -S -o largefile.s
(timeout = 1200)
PASS: largefile.c -O1 (test for excess errors)
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ largefile.c -O1 -I. -S -o largefile.s
(timeout = 1200)
PASS: largefile.c -O1 (test for excess errors)
PASS: gcc.dg/pch/largefile.c -O1 assembly comparison
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ ./largefile.h -O2 -o largefile.h.gch
(timeout = 1200)
PASS: ./largefile.h -O2 (test for excess errors)
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ largefile.c -O2 -I. -S -o largefile.s
(timeout = 1200)
PASS: largefile.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ largefile.c -O2 -I. -S -o largefile.s
(timeout = 1200)
PASS: largefile.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
PASS: gcc.dg/pch/largefile.c -O2 assembly comparison
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ ./largefile.h -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-o largefile.h.gch \ (timeout = 1200)
PASS: ./largefile.h -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (test for excess errors)
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ largefile.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-I. -S -o largefile.s \ (timeout = 1200)
PASS: largefile.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (test for excess errors)
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ largefile.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-I. -S -o largefile.s \ (timeout = 1200)
PASS: largefile.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (test for excess errors)
PASS: gcc.dg/pch/largefile.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer assembly comparison
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ ./largefile.h -O3 -g -o
largefile.h.gch (timeout = 1200\)
PASS: ./largefile.h -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ largefile.c -O3 -g -I. -S -o
largefile.s (timeout = 1200\)
PASS: largefile.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ largefile.c -O3 -g -I. -S -o
largefile.s (timeout = 1200\)
PASS: largefile.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
PASS: gcc.dg/pch/largefile.c -O3 -g assembly comparison
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ ./largefile.h -Os -o largefile.h.gch
(timeout = 1200)
PASS: ./largefile.h -Os (test for excess errors)
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ largefile.c -Os -I. -S -o largefile.s
(timeout = 1200)
PASS: largefile.c -Os (test for excess errors)
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ largefile.c -Os -I. -S -o largefile.s
(timeout = 1200)
PASS: largefile.c -Os (test for excess errors)
PASS: gcc.dg/pch/largefile.c -Os assembly comparison
sorry for the back slashes...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-07 19:21 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
@ 2005-01-07 19:23 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-07 20:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (19 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com @ 2005-01-07 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-01-07 19:23 -------
oh, the last one was run with gcc cvs trunk LAST_UPDATED: Thu Jan 6 20:22:33
UTC 2005
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-07 19:23 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
@ 2005-01-07 20:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-07 20:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (18 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-07 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-07 20:39 -------
Some information.
It failed since at least 2004-05-12:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-05/msg00747.html
But it passed on 2004-04-28:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-05/msg00073.html
I will see if there are more testresults between those dates.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-07 20:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-07 20:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-07 20:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-07 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-07 20:51 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> Some information.
One more note this is not related to the tree-ssa merge because that happened on the 13th.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-07 20:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-07 20:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-07 20:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-07 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-07 20:53 -------
It was broken on the 2nd:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-05/msg00231.html
Now someone has to figure out which patch broke it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-07 20:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-07 20:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-10 7:32 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (15 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-07 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-07 20:55 -------
Hmm but according to earlier results in April it was broken before then:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-04/msg01175.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-07 20:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-10 7:32 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-15 10:50 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com @ 2005-01-10 7:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-01-10 07:32 -------
These PCH problems does not occur on the current 3.4 branch:
See test results at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-01/msg00353.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-10 7:32 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
@ 2005-01-15 10:50 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-16 1:54 ` [Bug c++/19300] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-15 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15 10:50 -------
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-01/msg00665.html
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-01-15 10:50:39
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-15 10:50 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-16 1:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-16 9:10 ` [Bug target/19300] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-16 1:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16 01:54 -------
I cannot decide if I should put this in C++ or debug component based on:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg00871.html
But if it was broken by the patch referenced in that email then the testresults does not make sense back
from April since that patch only went in September.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|other |c++
Keywords| |wrong-debug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-16 1:54 ` [Bug c++/19300] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-16 9:10 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-16 9:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-16 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16 09:09 -------
> I cannot decide if I should put this in C++ or debug component based on:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg00871.html
Unrelated. Linux uses DWARF-2 and there is no problem on other architectures.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|c++ |target
Keywords|wrong-debug |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-16 9:10 ` [Bug target/19300] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-16 9:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-29 14:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-16 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16 09:15 -------
> Unrelated. Linux uses DWARF-2 and there is no problem on other architectures.
Moreover the tests fail without -g too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-16 9:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-29 14:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-11 17:25 ` phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-29 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-29 14:01 -------
Even though this is a user visible regression. This is not a regression as it was just by chance that this
worked in the first place:
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-11/msg00232.html>.
Removing the target milestone because sparc-linux is not a primary or secondary target and this was
only working by chance before
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-29 14:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-11 17:25 ` phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-13 2:24 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: phython at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-11 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-11 12:48 -------
Created an attachment (id=8174)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8174&action=view)
copy some code from pa-host.c
This seems to fix some pch failures on sparc64-linux. I don't trust my
testing so far though.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |phython at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-11 17:25 ` phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-13 2:24 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-02-14 20:14 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com @ 2005-02-13 2:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-02-12 21:48 -------
This does indeed look promising, compare the test results for sparc-linux at
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Feb 11 13:36:22 UTC 2005, without the patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8174&action=view, at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-02/msg00433.html, and with the patch
at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-02/msg00458.html (no PCH
failures). I'd say this is a good patch to apply.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-13 2:24 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
@ 2005-02-14 20:14 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-02-15 23:48 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com @ 2005-02-14 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-02-14 15:56 -------
Again, same checkout, but built for sparc64-linux, test results *with
phython's patch* posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-02/msg00566.html
Will start a build *without* the patch, for sparc64-linux later today.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-14 20:14 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
@ 2005-02-15 23:48 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-16 0:04 ` phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-15 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-15 20:52 -------
Subject: Bug 19300
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: phython@gcc.gnu.org 2005-02-15 20:52:14
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog
gcc/config : host-linux.c
Log message:
2005-02-15 James A. Morrison <phython@gcc.gnu.org>
PR pch/14940
PR target/19300
* config/host-linux.c (linux_gt_pch_use_address): Copy from
config/pa/pa-host.c:pa_gt_pch_use_address.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.7484&r2=2.7485
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/host-linux.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.6&r2=1.7
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-15 23:48 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-16 0:04 ` phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-16 0:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: phython at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-16 0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-15 20:56 -------
Fixed with the previous commit
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-16 0:04 ` phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-16 0:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-02 19:04 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-16 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-16 0:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-02 19:04 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-02 23:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-02 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-02 19:03 -------
Subject: Bug 19300
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: ian@gcc.gnu.org 2005-08-02 19:03:46
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog c-pch.c config.host ggc-common.c
hooks.c hooks.h hosthooks-def.h hosthooks.h
gcc/config/rs6000: host-darwin.c
gcc/doc : hostconfig.texi
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pch: pch.exp
Added files:
gcc/config : host-linux.c host-solaris.c x-linux x-solaris
Log message:
./
PR pch/14400
Backport from mainline:
2005-08-01 Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>
* config/host-linux.c (linux_gt_pch_get_address): Add new name
randomize_va_space for virtual address randomization control.
2005-02-15 James A. Morrison <phython@gcc.gnu.org>
PR pch/14940
PR target/19300
* config/host-linux.c (linux_gt_pch_use_address): Copy from
config/pa/pa-host.c:pa_gt_pch_use_address.
2004-11-09 James A. Morrison <phython@gcc.gnu.org>
PR pch/14940
* config/host-linux.c (TRY_EMPTY_VM_SPACE): Add __sparc__
definitions.
2004-10-15 Jon Grimm <jgrimm2@us.ibm.com>
* config/host-linux.c (TRY_EMPTY_VM_SPACE): Add __powerpc__
definition.
2004-04-24 Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
* config/host-linux.c (TRY_EMPTY_VM_SPACE): Define for __s390__
and __s390x__ hosts.
2004-04-08 Ian Lance Taylor <ian@wasabisystems.com>
* config/rs6000/host-darwin.c (darwin_rs6000_gt_pch_use_address):
Return 1 if file was successfully mapped.
2004-03-15 Ian Lance Taylor <ian@wasabisystems.com>
* config/rs6000/host-darwin.c (darwin_rs6000_gt_pch_use_address):
Fix the check for abort and only do the mmap if we can.
2004-03-12 Andrew Pinski <apinski@apple.com>
* config/rs6000/host-darwin.c (darwin_rs6000_gt_pch_use_address):
Use ret instead of result. Use addr instead of base.
2004-03-10 Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
* c-pch.c (c_common_no_more_pch): Update for gt_pch_use_address
extra arguments.
* config.host (*-*-solaris2*, *-*-linux*): Add out_host_hook_obj
and host_xmake_file fragments.
* ggc-common.c (gt_pch_save): Update for gt_pch_get_address change.
(gt_pch_restore): Similarly for gt_pch_use_address.
(default_gt_pch_get_address): New.
(mmap_gt_pch_get_address): Split out of gt_pch_save.
(default_gt_pch_use_address): Split out of gt_pch_restore.
(mmap_gt_pch_use_address): Likewise.
* hooks.c (hook_voidp_size_t_null): Remove.
(hook_bool_voidp_size_t_false): Remove.
* hooks.h: Likewise.
* hosthooks-def.h (HOST_HOOKS_GT_PCH_GET_ADDRESS): Use one of the
default_ or mmap_ definitions.
(HOST_HOOKS_GT_PCH_USE_ADDRESS): Likewise.
* hosthooks.h (struct host_hooks): Update gt_pch_get_address
and gt_pch_use_address.
* config/host-linux.c, config/host-solaris.c: New files.
* config/x-linux, config/x-solaris: New files.
* config/rs6000/host-darwin.c darwin_rs6000_gt_pch_get_address):
Update for changed definition.
(darwin_rs6000_gt_pch_use_address): Likewise.
* doc/hostconfig.texi: Update docs.
testsuite/
PR pch/14400
Backport from mainline:
2004-04-07 Ian Lance Taylor <ian@wasabisystems.com>
* gcc.dg/pch/pch.exp: Add largefile test.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=2.2326.2.893&r2=2.2326.2.894
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/c-pch.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.19.4.1&r2=1.19.4.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config.host.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=2.7&r2=2.7.12.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ggc-common.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.78&r2=1.78.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/hooks.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.22.10.2&r2=1.22.10.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/hooks.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.23.10.2&r2=1.23.10.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/hosthooks-def.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.3&r2=1.3.12.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/hosthooks.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.4&r2=1.4.12.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/host-linux.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.11.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/host-solaris.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.3.4.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/x-linux.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.6.48.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/x-solaris.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.2.50.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/rs6000/host-darwin.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.7&r2=1.7.12.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/doc/hostconfig.texi.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.7&r2=1.7.10.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.3389.2.416&r2=1.3389.2.417
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pch/pch.exp.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.8&r2=1.8.18.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-02 19:04 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-02 23:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-04 9:47 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-08-04 10:01 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-02 23:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-02 23:40 -------
Also fixed in 3.4.5.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.0 |3.4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-02 23:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-04 9:47 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-08-04 10:01 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com @ 2005-08-04 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-08-04 09:46 -------
(In reply to comment #24)
> Also fixed in 3.4.5.
This is the currently, 2005-08-03, latest test results I have for 3.4:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-08/msg00196.html
and the gcc PCH tests that FAIL are for -m64:
FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-1.c -O0 -g assembly comparison
FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-1.c -O0 assembly comparison
FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-1.c -O1 assembly comparison
FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-2.c -O0 -g assembly comparison
FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-2.c -O0 assembly comparison
FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-2.c -O1 assembly comparison
FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-3.c -O0 -g assembly comparison
FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-3.c -O0 assembly comparison
FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-3.c -O1 assembly comparison
and from the log file, for example:
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/branch/objdir.3.4/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/branch/objdir.3.4/gcc/
/usr/local/src/branch/gcc.3.4/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pch/static-1.c -O0 -g -I. -S
-m64 -o static-1.s (timeout = 600)
PASS: gcc.dg/pch/static-1.c -O0 -g (test for excess errors)
line #48
< !#PROLOGUE# 0
> .register %g2, #scratch
line #49
< save %sp, -192, %sp
> .register %g3, #scratch
line #50
< .LLCFI1:
> !#PROLOGUE# 0
line #51
< !#PROLOGUE# 1
> save %sp, -192, %sp
line #52
< .loc 2 5 0
> .LLCFI1:
line #53
< sethi %hi(counter.1), %g1
> !#PROLOGUE# 1
line #54
< or %g1, %lo(counter.1), %g1
> .loc 2 5 0
line #55
< mov %g1, %g2
> sethi %hi(counter.1), %g1
line #56
< ld [%g2], %g1
> or %g1, %lo(counter.1), %g1
line #57
< mov %g1, %g3
> mov %g1, %g2
line #58
< add %g1, 1, %g1
> ld [%g2], %g1
line #59
< st %g1, [%g2]
> mov %g1, %g3
line #60
< sra %g3, 0, %g1
> add %g1, 1, %g1
line #61
< .loc 2 6 0
> st %g1, [%g2]
line #62
< mov %g1, %i0
> sra %g3, 0, %g1
line #63
< return %i7+8
> .loc 2 6 0
line #64
< nop
> mov %g1, %i0
line #65
< .LLFE3:
> return %i7+8
line #66
< .size bar, .-bar
> nop
line #67
< .section ".debug_frame"
> .LLFE3:
line #68
< .LLframe0:
> .size bar, .-bar
line #69
< .uaword .LLECIE0-.LLSCIE0
> .section ".debug_frame"
line #70
< .LLSCIE0:
> .LLframe0:
line #71
< .uaword 0xffffffff
> .uaword .LLECIE0-.LLSCIE0
line #72
< .byte 0x1
> .LLSCIE0:
line #73
< .asciz ""
> .uaword 0xffffffff
line #74
< .uleb128 0x1
> .byte 0x1
line #75
< .sleb128 -8
> .asciz ""
line #76
< .byte 0xf
> .uleb128 0x1
line #77
< .byte 0xc
> .sleb128 -8
line #78
< .uleb128 0xe
> .byte 0xf
line #79
< .uleb128 0x7ff
> .byte 0xc
line #80
< .align 8
> .uleb128 0xe
line #81
< .LLECIE0:
> .uleb128 0x7ff
line #82
< .LLSFDE0:
> .align 8
line #83
< .uaword .LLEFDE0-.LLASFDE0
> .LLECIE0:
line #84
< .LLASFDE0:
> .LLSFDE0:
line #85
< .uaword .LLframe0
> .uaword .LLEFDE0-.LLASFDE0
line #86
< .uaxword .LLFB2
> .LLASFDE0:
line #87
< .uaxword .LLFE2-.LLFB2
> .uaword .LLframe0
line #88
< .byte 0x4
> .uaxword .LLFB2
line #89
< .uaword .LLCFI0-.LLFB2
> .uaxword .LLFE2-.LLFB2
line #90
< .byte 0xd
> .byte 0x4
line #91
< .uleb128 0x1e
> .uaword .LLCFI0-.LLFB2
line #92
< .byte 0x2d
> .byte 0xd
line #93
< .byte 0x9
> .uleb128 0x1e
line #94
< .uleb128 0xf
> .byte 0x2d
line #95
< .uleb128 0x1f
> .byte 0x9
line #96
< .align 8
> .uleb128 0xf
line #97
< .LLEFDE0:
> .uleb128 0x1f
line #98
< .LLSFDE2:
> .align 8
line #99
< .uaword .LLEFDE2-.LLASFDE2
> .LLEFDE0:
line #100
< .LLASFDE2:
> .LLSFDE2:
line #101
< .uaword .LLframe0
> .uaword .LLEFDE2-.LLASFDE2
line #102
< .uaxword .LLFB3
> .LLASFDE2:
line #103
< .uaxword .LLFE3-.LLFB3
> .uaword .LLframe0
line #104
< .byte 0x4
> .uaxword .LLFB3
line #105
< .uaword .LLCFI1-.LLFB3
> .uaxword .LLFE3-.LLFB3
line #106
< .byte 0xd
> .byte 0x4
line #107
< .uleb128 0x1e
> .uaword .LLCFI1-.LLFB3
line #108
< .byte 0x2d
> .byte 0xd
line #109
< .byte 0x9
> .uleb128 0x1e
line #110
< .uleb128 0xf
> .byte 0x2d
line #111
< .uleb128 0x1f
> .byte 0x9
line #112
< .align 8
> .uleb128 0xf
line #113
< .LLEFDE2:
> .uleb128 0x1f
line #114
< .section ".text"
> .align 8
line #115
< .LLetext0:
> .LLEFDE2:
line #116
< .section ".debug_info"
> .section ".text"
line #117
< .uaword 0x12c
> .LLetext0:
line #118
< .uahalf 0x2
> .section ".debug_info"
line #119
< .uaword .LLdebug_abbrev0
> .uaword 0x12c
line #120
< .byte 0x8
> .uahalf 0x2
line #121
< .uleb128 0x1
> .uaword .LLdebug_abbrev0
line #122
< .uaword .LLdebug_line0
> .byte 0x8
line #123
< .uaxword .LLetext0
> .uleb128 0x1
line #124
< .uaxword .LLtext0
> .uaword .LLdebug_line0
line #125
< .asciz "GNU C 3.4.5 20050803 (prerelease)"
> .uaxword .LLetext0
line #126
< .byte 0x1
> .uaxword .LLtext0
line #127
< .asciz "/usr/local/src/branch/gcc.3.4/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pch/static-1.c"
> .asciz "GNU C 3.4.5 20050803 (prerelease)"
line #128
< .asciz "/usr/local/src/branch/objdir.3.4/gcc/testsuite"
> .byte 0x1
line #129
< .uleb128 0x2
> .asciz "/usr/local/src/branch/gcc.3.4/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pch/static-1.c"
line #130
< .uaword 0xf0
> .asciz "/usr/local/src/branch/objdir.3.4/gcc/testsuite"
line #131
< .asciz "foo"
> .uleb128 0x2
line #132
< .byte 0x1
> .uaword 0xf0
line #133
< .byte 0x2
> .asciz "foo"
line #135
< .uaword 0xf0
> .byte 0x2
line #136
< .uaxword .LLFB2
> .byte 0x1
line #137
< .uaxword .LLFE2
> .uaword 0xf0
line #138
< .byte 0x1
> .uaxword .LLFB2
line #139
< .byte 0x6e
> .uaxword .LLFE2
line #140
< .uleb128 0x3
> .byte 0x1
line #141
< .asciz "counter"
> .byte 0x6e
line #142
< .byte 0x1
> .uleb128 0x3
line #143
< .byte 0x3
> .asciz "counter"
line #144
< .uaword 0xf0
> .byte 0x1
line #145
< .byte 0x9
> .byte 0x3
line #146
< .byte 0x3
> .uaword 0xf0
line #147
< .uaxword counter.0
> .byte 0x9
line #148
< .byte 0x0
> .byte 0x3
line #149
< .uleb128 0x4
> .uaxword counter.0
line #150
< .asciz "int"
> .byte 0x0
line #151
< .byte 0x4
> .uleb128 0x4
line #152
< .byte 0x5
> .asciz "int"
line #153
< .uleb128 0x5
> .byte 0x4
line #154
< .asciz "bar"
> .byte 0x5
line #155
< .byte 0x2
> .uleb128 0x5
line #156
< .byte 0x3
> .asciz "bar"
line #157
< .byte 0x1
> .byte 0x2
line #158
< .uaword 0xf0
> .byte 0x3
line #159
< .uaxword .LLFB3
> .byte 0x1
line #160
< .uaxword .LLFE3
> .uaword 0xf0
line #161
< .byte 0x1
> .uaxword .LLFB3
line #162
< .byte 0x6e
> .uaxword .LLFE3
line #163
< .uleb128 0x3
> .byte 0x1
line #164
< .asciz "counter"
> .byte 0x6e
line #165
< .byte 0x2
> .uleb128 0x3
line #166
< .byte 0x4
> .asciz "counter"
line #167
< .uaword 0xf0
> .byte 0x2
line #168
< .byte 0x9
> .byte 0x4
line #169
< .byte 0x3
> .uaword 0xf0
line #170
< .uaxword counter.1
> .byte 0x9
line #171
< .byte 0x0
> .byte 0x3
line #172
< .byte 0x0
> .uaxword counter.1
line #173
< .section ".debug_abbrev"
> .byte 0x0
line #174
< .uleb128 0x1
> .byte 0x0
line #175
< .uleb128 0x11
> .section ".debug_abbrev"
line #176
< .byte 0x1
> .uleb128 0x1
line #177
< .uleb128 0x10
> .uleb128 0x11
line #178
< .uleb128 0x6
> .byte 0x1
line #179
< .uleb128 0x12
> .uleb128 0x10
line #180
< .uleb128 0x1
> .uleb128 0x6
line #181
< .uleb128 0x11
> .uleb128 0x12
line #183
< .uleb128 0x25
> .uleb128 0x11
line #184
< .uleb128 0x8
> .uleb128 0x1
line #185
< .uleb128 0x13
> .uleb128 0x25
line #186
< .uleb128 0xb
> .uleb128 0x8
line #187
< .uleb128 0x3
> .uleb128 0x13
line #188
< .uleb128 0x8
> .uleb128 0xb
line #189
< .uleb128 0x1b
> .uleb128 0x3
line #191
< .byte 0x0
> .uleb128 0x1b
line #192
< .byte 0x0
> .uleb128 0x8
line #193
< .uleb128 0x2
> .byte 0x0
line #194
< .uleb128 0x2e
> .byte 0x0
line #195
< .byte 0x1
> .uleb128 0x2
line #196
< .uleb128 0x1
> .uleb128 0x2e
line #197
< .uleb128 0x13
> .byte 0x1
line #198
< .uleb128 0x3
> .uleb128 0x1
line #199
< .uleb128 0x8
> .uleb128 0x13
line #200
< .uleb128 0x3a
> .uleb128 0x3
line #201
< .uleb128 0xb
> .uleb128 0x8
line #202
< .uleb128 0x3b
> .uleb128 0x3a
line #204
< .uleb128 0x27
> .uleb128 0x3b
line #205
< .uleb128 0xc
> .uleb128 0xb
line #206
< .uleb128 0x49
> .uleb128 0x27
line #207
< .uleb128 0x13
> .uleb128 0xc
line #208
< .uleb128 0x11
> .uleb128 0x49
line #209
< .uleb128 0x1
> .uleb128 0x13
line #210
< .uleb128 0x12
> .uleb128 0x11
line #212
< .uleb128 0x40
> .uleb128 0x12
line #213
< .uleb128 0xa
> .uleb128 0x1
line #214
< .byte 0x0
> .uleb128 0x40
line #215
< .byte 0x0
> .uleb128 0xa
line #216
< .uleb128 0x3
> .byte 0x0
line #217
< .uleb128 0x34
> .byte 0x0
line #218
< .byte 0x0
> .uleb128 0x3
line #219
< .uleb128 0x3
> .uleb128 0x34
line #220
< .uleb128 0x8
> .byte 0x0
line #221
< .uleb128 0x3a
> .uleb128 0x3
line #222
< .uleb128 0xb
> .uleb128 0x8
line #223
< .uleb128 0x3b
> .uleb128 0x3a
line #225
< .uleb128 0x49
> .uleb128 0x3b
line #226
< .uleb128 0x13
> .uleb128 0xb
line #227
< .uleb128 0x2
> .uleb128 0x49
line #228
< .uleb128 0xa
> .uleb128 0x13
line #229
< .byte 0x0
> .uleb128 0x2
line #230
< .byte 0x0
> .uleb128 0xa
line #231
< .uleb128 0x4
> .byte 0x0
line #232
< .uleb128 0x24
> .byte 0x0
line #233
< .byte 0x0
> .uleb128 0x4
line #234
< .uleb128 0x3
> .uleb128 0x24
line #235
< .uleb128 0x8
> .byte 0x0
line #236
< .uleb128 0xb
> .uleb128 0x3
line #237
< .uleb128 0xb
> .uleb128 0x8
line #238
< .uleb128 0x3e
> .uleb128 0xb
line #240
< .byte 0x0
> .uleb128 0x3e
line #241
< .byte 0x0
> .uleb128 0xb
line #242
< .uleb128 0x5
> .byte 0x0
line #243
< .uleb128 0x2e
> .byte 0x0
line #244
< .byte 0x1
> .uleb128 0x5
line #245
< .uleb128 0x3
> .uleb128 0x2e
line #246
< .uleb128 0x8
> .byte 0x1
line #247
< .uleb128 0x3a
> .uleb128 0x3
line #248
< .uleb128 0xb
> .uleb128 0x8
line #249
< .uleb128 0x3b
> .uleb128 0x3a
line #251
< .uleb128 0x27
> .uleb128 0x3b
line #252
< .uleb128 0xc
> .uleb128 0xb
line #253
< .uleb128 0x49
> .uleb128 0x27
line #254
< .uleb128 0x13
> .uleb128 0xc
line #255
< .uleb128 0x11
> .uleb128 0x49
line #256
< .uleb128 0x1
> .uleb128 0x13
line #257
< .uleb128 0x12
> .uleb128 0x11
line #259
< .uleb128 0x40
> .uleb128 0x12
line #260
< .uleb128 0xa
> .uleb128 0x1
line #261
< .byte 0x0
> .uleb128 0x40
line #262
< .byte 0x0
> .uleb128 0xa
line #264
< .section ".debug_aranges"
> .byte 0x0
line #265
< .uaword 0x2c
> .byte 0x0
line #266
< .uahalf 0x2
> .section ".debug_aranges"
line #267
< .uaword .LLdebug_info0
> .uaword 0x2c
line #268
< .byte 0x8
> .uahalf 0x2
line #269
< .byte 0x0
> .uaword .LLdebug_info0
line #270
< .uahalf 0x0
> .byte 0x8
line #271
< .uahalf 0x0
> .byte 0x0
line #272
< .uaxword .LLtext0
> .uahalf 0x0
line #273
< .uaxword .LLetext0-.LLtext0
> .uahalf 0x0
line #274
< .uaxword 0x0
> .uaxword .LLtext0
line #275
< .uaxword 0x0
> .uaxword .LLetext0-.LLtext0
line #276
< .section ".note.GNU-stack"
> .uaxword 0x0
line #277
< .ident "GCC: (GNU) 3.4.5 20050803 (prerelease)"
> .uaxword 0x0
FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-1.c -O0 -g assembly comparison
and the g++ PCH tests that FAIL are for -m64:
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/system-1.C -g assembly comparison
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/system-2.C -g assembly comparison
and from the log file we see similar problems as with the gc PCH failures...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
` (27 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-04 9:47 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
@ 2005-08-04 10:01 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
28 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-04 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-04 10:01 -------
> This is the currently, 2005-08-03, latest test results I have for 3.4:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-08/msg00196.html
>
> and the gcc PCH tests that FAIL are for -m64:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-1.c -O0 -g assembly comparison
> FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-1.c -O0 assembly comparison
> FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-1.c -O1 assembly comparison
> FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-2.c -O0 -g assembly comparison
> FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-2.c -O0 assembly comparison
> FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-2.c -O1 assembly comparison
> FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-3.c -O0 -g assembly comparison
> FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-3.c -O0 assembly comparison
> FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-3.c -O1 assembly comparison
>
> and from the log file, for example:
>
> Executing on host: /usr/local/src/branch/objdir.3.4/gcc/xgcc
> -B/usr/local/src/branch/objdir.3.4/gcc/
> /usr/local/src/branch/gcc.3.4/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pch/static-1.c -O0 -g -I. -S
> -m64 -o static-1.s (timeout = 600)
> PASS: gcc.dg/pch/static-1.c -O0 -g (test for excess errors)
> line #48
> < !#PROLOGUE# 0
> > .register %g2, #scratch
> line #49
> < save %sp, -192, %sp
> > .register %g3, #scratch
> line #50
That's a PR of you too. A backport of
2005-04-15 David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
PR target/20673
* config/sparc/sparc.h (sparc_hard_reg_printed): Mark as GTY(()).
is pre-approved, assuming the release manager is OK with it.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |20673
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-08-04 10:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-01-06 19:55 [Bug c++/19300] New: PCH failuers on sparc-linux christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-06 19:56 ` [Bug other/19300] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-06 20:17 ` [Bug other/19300] PCH failures " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-06 20:20 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-07 11:03 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-07 11:13 ` [Bug other/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-07 13:52 ` [Bug other/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-07 18:05 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-07 19:21 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-07 19:23 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-07 20:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-07 20:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-07 20:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-07 20:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-10 7:32 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-15 10:50 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-16 1:54 ` [Bug c++/19300] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-16 9:10 ` [Bug target/19300] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-16 9:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-29 14:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-11 17:25 ` phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-13 2:24 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-02-14 20:14 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-02-15 23:48 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-16 0:04 ` phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-16 0:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-02 19:04 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-02 23:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-04 9:47 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-08-04 10:01 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).