* [Bug libmudflap/19319] Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program
2005-01-07 22:31 [Bug libmudflap/19319] New: Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program bredelin at ucla dot edu
@ 2005-01-07 22:42 ` fche at redhat dot com
2005-01-07 22:58 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (17 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2005-01-07 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fche at redhat dot com
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed| |1
GCC build triplet| i686-pc-linux-gnu |i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet| i686-pc-linux-gnu |i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet| i686-pc-linux-gnu |i686-pc-linux-gnu
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-01-07 22:42:03
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/19319] Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program
2005-01-07 22:31 [Bug libmudflap/19319] New: Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program bredelin at ucla dot edu
2005-01-07 22:42 ` [Bug libmudflap/19319] " fche at redhat dot com
@ 2005-01-07 22:58 ` fche at redhat dot com
2005-01-08 20:03 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2005-01-07 22:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2005-01-07 22:58 -------
Here is a simpler test case for at least one of the problems.
struct k {
int data;
k(int j): data(j) {}
};
k make_k () { return k(1); }
int main ()
{
k foo = make_k ();
return 0;
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/19319] Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program
2005-01-07 22:31 [Bug libmudflap/19319] New: Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program bredelin at ucla dot edu
2005-01-07 22:42 ` [Bug libmudflap/19319] " fche at redhat dot com
2005-01-07 22:58 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2005-01-08 20:03 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2005-01-10 17:04 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (15 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2005-01-08 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-01-08 20:03 -------
Analysis is here and in the follow-up:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-01/msg00460.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/19319] Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program
2005-01-07 22:31 [Bug libmudflap/19319] New: Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program bredelin at ucla dot edu
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-08 20:03 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2005-01-10 17:04 ` fche at redhat dot com
2005-01-18 9:35 ` bredelin at ucla dot edu
` (14 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2005-01-10 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2005-01-10 17:04 -------
This patch appears to fix the problem: testing and getting approvals
--- gimplify.c 1 Jan 2005 01:43:08 -0000 2.101
+++ gimplify.c 10 Jan 2005 17:03:54 -0000
@@ -2949,6 +2949,15 @@ gimplify_modify_expr (tree *expr_p, tree
if (ret != GS_UNHANDLED)
return ret;
+ /* Handle aggregate returns from function calls. We need to mark
+ the LHS addressable, since the expanded call will pass its
+ address as a hidden argument. */
+ if (TREE_CODE (*from_p) == CALL_EXPR)
+ {
+ if (aggregate_value_p (*to_p, *from_p))
+ lang_hooks.mark_addressable (*to_p);
+ }
+
/* If we've got a variable sized assignment between two lvalues (i.e. does
not involve a call), then we can make things a bit more straightforward
by converting the assignment to memcpy or memset. */
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/19319] Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program
2005-01-07 22:31 [Bug libmudflap/19319] New: Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program bredelin at ucla dot edu
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-10 17:04 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2005-01-18 9:35 ` bredelin at ucla dot edu
2005-02-13 18:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: bredelin at ucla dot edu @ 2005-01-18 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bredelin at ucla dot edu 2005-01-18 09:35 -------
Note that this is not just a bug in mudflap, but a bug in the middle end:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg00579.html
See follow-up on above message for a mention of a patch for this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/19319] Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program
2005-01-07 22:31 [Bug libmudflap/19319] New: Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program bredelin at ucla dot edu
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-18 9:35 ` bredelin at ucla dot edu
@ 2005-02-13 18:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-13 20:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-13 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-13 06:44 -------
Subject: Bug 19319
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: jason@gcc.gnu.org 2005-02-13 06:43:58
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog fold-const.c gimplify.c tree.h
Log message:
PR mudflap/19319
* gimplify.c (gimplify_modify_expr_rhs) [CALL_EXPR]: Make return
slot explicit.
PR c++/16405
* fold-const.c (fold_indirect_ref_1): Split out from...
(build_fold_indirect_ref): Here.
(fold_indirect_ref): New fn.
* tree.h: Declare it.
* gimplify.c (gimplify_compound_lval): Call fold_indirect_ref.
(gimplify_modify_expr_rhs): Likewise.
(gimplify_expr): Likewise.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.7461&r2=2.7462
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fold-const.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.507&r2=1.508
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/gimplify.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.108&r2=2.109
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/tree.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.689&r2=1.690
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/19319] Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program
2005-01-07 22:31 [Bug libmudflap/19319] New: Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program bredelin at ucla dot edu
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-13 18:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-13 20:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-13 20:09 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (11 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-13 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-13 12:49 -------
Subject: Bug 19319
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: fche@gcc.gnu.org 2005-02-13 12:49:34
Modified files:
libmudflap : ChangeLog
Added files:
libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.c++: pass55-frag.cxx
Log message:
2005-02-13 Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@redhat.com>
PR mudflap/19319
* testsuite/libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.c: New test.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libmudflap/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.48&r2=1.49
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/19319] Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program
2005-01-07 22:31 [Bug libmudflap/19319] New: Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program bredelin at ucla dot edu
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-13 20:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-13 20:09 ` fche at redhat dot com
2005-02-17 15:12 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2005-02-13 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2005-02-13 12:50 -------
Thank you, Jason!
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/19319] Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program
2005-01-07 22:31 [Bug libmudflap/19319] New: Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program bredelin at ucla dot edu
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-13 20:09 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2005-02-17 15:12 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-19 22:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-17 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-17 05:37 -------
Subject: Bug 19319
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: jason@gcc.gnu.org 2005-02-17 05:37:21
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog gimplify.c
Log message:
PR mudflap/19319, c++/19317
* gimplify.c (gimplify_modify_expr_rhs) [CALL_EXPR]: Make return
slot explicit.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.7504&r2=2.7505
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/gimplify.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.111&r2=2.112
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/19319] Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program
2005-01-07 22:31 [Bug libmudflap/19319] New: Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program bredelin at ucla dot edu
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-17 15:12 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-19 22:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-19 22:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-19 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-19 15:56 -------
Reopening as the patch had to be reverted.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/19319] Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program
2005-01-07 22:31 [Bug libmudflap/19319] New: Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program bredelin at ucla dot edu
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-19 22:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-19 22:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-19 22:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-19 22:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|fche at redhat dot com |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
| |dot org
Status|REOPENED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/19319] Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program
2005-01-07 22:31 [Bug libmudflap/19319] New: Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program bredelin at ucla dot edu
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-19 22:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-19 22:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-10 21:57 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-19 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fche at redhat dot com
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at redhat dot com
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/19319] Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program
2005-01-07 22:31 [Bug libmudflap/19319] New: Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program bredelin at ucla dot edu
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-19 22:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-10 21:57 ` fche at redhat dot com
2005-04-20 2:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2005-03-10 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2005-03-10 21:57 -------
Myseriously, the bug still appears fixed, in both 4_0-branch and mainline,
despite the reversion. See libmudflap/testsuite/*++/pass55*. For archival
purposes, the last approved but apparently unnecessary patch for this
problem was this one:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg00381.html
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/19319] Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program
2005-01-07 22:31 [Bug libmudflap/19319] New: Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program bredelin at ucla dot edu
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2005-03-10 21:57 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2005-04-20 2:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-18 20:05 ` gideon dot amos at canfieldsci dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-04-20 2:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/19319] Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program
2005-01-07 22:31 [Bug libmudflap/19319] New: Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program bredelin at ucla dot edu
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2005-04-20 2:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-18 20:05 ` gideon dot amos at canfieldsci dot com
2005-08-18 20:10 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: gideon dot amos at canfieldsci dot com @ 2005-08-18 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From gideon dot amos at canfieldsci dot com 2005-08-18 19:57 -------
I'm still getting a mudflap violation with the simpler test case, posted by
Frank Ch. Eigler, I get this on a debian linux system (Linux version
2.6.8-1-686-smp) with at least two builds of gcc:
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.0.1
[...]
$ gcc -dumpmachine
target i686-pc-linux-gnu
and
$ gcc-4.0 --version
gcc-4.0 (GCC) 4.0.2 20050816 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.1-5)
[...]
$ gcc-4.0 -dumpmachine
i486-linux-gnu
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/19319] Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program
2005-01-07 22:31 [Bug libmudflap/19319] New: Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program bredelin at ucla dot edu
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-18 20:05 ` gideon dot amos at canfieldsci dot com
@ 2005-08-18 20:10 ` fche at redhat dot com
2005-08-18 22:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2005-08-18 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2005-08-18 20:05 -------
still broken.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/19319] Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program
2005-01-07 22:31 [Bug libmudflap/19319] New: Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program bredelin at ucla dot edu
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-18 20:10 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2005-08-18 22:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-23 21:35 ` fche at redhat dot com
2005-09-23 21:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-18 22:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/19319] Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program
2005-01-07 22:31 [Bug libmudflap/19319] New: Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program bredelin at ucla dot edu
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-18 22:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-23 21:35 ` fche at redhat dot com
2005-09-23 21:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2005-09-23 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2005-09-23 21:35 -------
I can't explain it, but on today's mainline, this bug does not appear. I'm
going to commit the smaller test case ("... make_k ...") from above to
libmudflap/testsuite. If this test fails, please post an attachment with the
error log. Since neither my x86 nor x86-64 machine shows the problem, it may be
necessary for you to rebuild the test case with extra dump flags
("-fdump-tree-all" and friends) and scour through that for clues.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libmudflap/19319] Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program
2005-01-07 22:31 [Bug libmudflap/19319] New: Mudflap produce many violations on simple, correct c++ program bredelin at ucla dot edu
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-23 21:35 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2005-09-23 21:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-23 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-23 21:35 -------
Subject: Bug 19319
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: fche@gcc.gnu.org 2005-09-23 21:35:17
Modified files:
libmudflap : ChangeLog
Added files:
libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.c++: pass58-frag.cxx
Log message:
2005-09-23 Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@elastic.org>
* testsuite/libmudflap.c++/pass58-frag.cxx: New test for heisenbug 19319.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libmudflap/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.71&r2=1.72
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.c++/pass58-frag.cxx.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19319
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread