* [Bug fortran/17675] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE
2004-09-26 6:46 [Bug fortran/17675] New: Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-11 8:05 ` c dot christian dot joensson at comhem dot se
2004-11-13 14:32 ` [Bug fortran/17675] [4.0 Regression] " giovannibajo at libero dot it
` (18 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: c dot christian dot joensson at comhem dot se @ 2004-10-11 8:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |christian at j-son dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17675] [4.0 Regression] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE
2004-09-26 6:46 [Bug fortran/17675] New: Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-11 8:05 ` [Bug fortran/17675] " c dot christian dot joensson at comhem dot se
@ 2004-11-13 14:32 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-11-16 8:37 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2004-11-13 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-11-13 14:31 -------
A regression wrt the old frontend.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Alignment constraints not |[4.0 Regression] Alignment
|honored in EQUIVALENCE |constraints not honored in
| |EQUIVALENCE
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17675] [4.0 Regression] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE
2004-09-26 6:46 [Bug fortran/17675] New: Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-11 8:05 ` [Bug fortran/17675] " c dot christian dot joensson at comhem dot se
2004-11-13 14:32 ` [Bug fortran/17675] [4.0 Regression] " giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2004-11-16 8:37 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-17 15:09 ` phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-11-16 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-16 08:36 -------
This is critical on the SPARC.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17675] [4.0 Regression] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE
2004-09-26 6:46 [Bug fortran/17675] New: Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-11-16 8:37 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-11-17 15:09 ` phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-30 18:25 ` c dot christian dot joensson at comhem dot se
` (15 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: phython at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-11-17 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-17 15:09 -------
I'm getting the same problems on sparc32 builds.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-11-17 15:09:20
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17675] [4.0 Regression] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE
2004-09-26 6:46 [Bug fortran/17675] New: Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-11-17 15:09 ` phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-11-30 18:25 ` c dot christian dot joensson at comhem dot se
2004-12-17 20:42 ` [Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] " phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: c dot christian dot joensson at comhem dot se @ 2004-11-30 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From c dot christian dot joensson at comhem dot se 2004-11-30 18:25 -------
well, I get a few too, see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-
11/msg01283.html and http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-
11/msg01296.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE
2004-09-26 6:46 [Bug fortran/17675] New: Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-11-30 18:25 ` c dot christian dot joensson at comhem dot se
@ 2004-12-17 20:42 ` phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-19 18:09 ` phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: phython at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-17 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-17 20:42 -------
I haven't tested this yet, but perhaps something as simple as
Index: trans-common.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/gcc/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-common.c,v
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -p -r1.18 trans-common.c
--- trans-common.c 16 Sep 2004 16:00:43 -0000 1.18
+++ trans-common.c 17 Dec 2004 20:41:48 -0000
@@ -269,6 +269,9 @@ build_equiv_decl (tree union_type, bool
TREE_ADDRESSABLE (decl) = 1;
TREE_USED (decl) = 1;
+ DECL_ALIGN (decl) = BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT;
+ DECL_USER_ALIGN (decl) = 0;
+
/* The source location has been lost, and doesn't really matter.
We need to set it to something though. */
gfc_set_decl_location (decl, &gfc_current_locus);
Would fix the problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE
2004-09-26 6:46 [Bug fortran/17675] New: Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-12-17 20:42 ` [Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] " phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-19 18:09 ` phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-21 0:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: phython at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-19 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-19 18:09 -------
Sorry for the noise. That patch doesn't do anything.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE
2004-09-26 6:46 [Bug fortran/17675] New: Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-12-19 18:09 ` phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-21 0:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-04 22:48 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-21 0:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-21 00:39 -------
Patch here: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg01605.html>.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GCC build triplet|sparc*-*-* |
GCC host triplet|sparc*-*-* |
GCC target triplet|sparc*-*-* |sparc*-*-*, ia64-*-*,
| |alpha*-*-*
Keywords| |patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE
2004-09-26 6:46 [Bug fortran/17675] New: Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2004-12-21 0:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-04 22:48 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-06 14:41 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-04 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-04 22:48 -------
I don't think that patch is sufficient. I'm about halfway to a fix.
I don't think the behaviour should be conditional on STRICT_ALIGNMENT.
Either enforce alignment, or annotate things properly so that the backend
generates unaligned loads. g77 enforces alignment.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-17 15:09:20 |2005-01-04 22:48:21
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE
2004-09-26 6:46 [Bug fortran/17675] New: Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-04 22:48 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-06 14:41 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-08 21:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-06 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |19292
nThis| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE
2004-09-26 6:46 [Bug fortran/17675] New: Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-06 14:41 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-08 21:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-09 22:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-08 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-08 21:43 -------
*** Bug 19338 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |danglin at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE
2004-09-26 6:46 [Bug fortran/17675] New: Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-08 21:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-09 22:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-09 22:59 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-09 22:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-09 22:57 -------
Subject: Bug 17675
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: pbrook@gcc.gnu.org 2005-01-09 22:57:45
Modified files:
gcc/fortran : ChangeLog trans-common.c
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg: common_2.f90 common_3.f90
Log message:
2005-01-09 Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
PR fortran/17675
* trans-common.c (current_common, current_offset): Remove.
(create_common): Add head argument.
(align_segment): New function.
(apply_segment_offset): New function.
(translate_common): Merge code from new_segment. Handle alignment.
(new_segment): Remove.
(finish_equivalences): Ensure proper alignment.
testsuite/
* gfortran.dg/common_2.f90: New file.
* gfortran.dg/common_3.f90: New file.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.288&r2=1.289
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-common.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.18&r2=1.19
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4874&r2=1.4875
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/common_2.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/common_3.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE
2004-09-26 6:46 [Bug fortran/17675] New: Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-09 22:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-09 22:59 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-09 23:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-09 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-09 22:59 -------
Should be fixed now.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE
2004-09-26 6:46 [Bug fortran/17675] New: Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-09 22:59 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-09 23:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-16 12:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-09 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-09 23:16 -------
> Should be fixed now.
Unfortunately not all of them:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-10.f -O0 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-10.f -O1 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-10.f -O2 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-10.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-10.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-10.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops
-finline-functions execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-10.f -O3 -g execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-10.f -Os execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-7.f -O0 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-7.f -O1 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-7.f -O2 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-7.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-7.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-7.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops
-finline-functions execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-7.f -O3 -g execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-7.f -Os execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-8.f -O0 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-8.f -O1 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-8.f -O2 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-8.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-8.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-8.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops
-finline-functions execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-8.f -O3 -g execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-8.f -Os execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-9.f -O0 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-9.f -O1 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-9.f -O2 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-9.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-9.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-9.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops
-finline-functions execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-9.f -O3 -g execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-9.f -Os execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980701-1.f -O0 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980701-1.f -O1 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980701-1.f -O2 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980701-1.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980701-1.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980701-1.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops
-finline-functions execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980701-1.f -O3 -g execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980701-1.f -Os execution test
Note that Steve's patch fixes all of them.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE
2004-09-26 6:46 [Bug fortran/17675] New: Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-09 23:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-16 12:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-16 15:48 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-16 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16 12:06 -------
Subject: Bug 17675
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: pbrook@gcc.gnu.org 2005-01-16 12:05:54
Modified files:
gcc/fortran : ChangeLog trans-common.c
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg: common_4.f90
Log message:
2004-01-16 Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
PR fortran/17675
* trans-common.c (translate_common): Remove duplicate function call.
(finish_equivalences): Preserve alignment when biasing offsets.
testsuite/
* gfortran.dg/common_4.f90: New test.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.293&r2=1.294
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-common.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.20&r2=1.21
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4893&r2=1.4894
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/common_4.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE
2004-09-26 6:46 [Bug fortran/17675] New: Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-16 12:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-16 15:48 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-16 16:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-16 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16 15:47 -------
> PR fortran/17675
> * trans-common.c (translate_common): Remove duplicate function call.
> (finish_equivalences): Preserve alignment when biasing offsets.
> testsuite/
> * gfortran.dg/common_4.f90: New test.
You got them all on both SPARC 32-bit and 64-bit. Thanks!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE
2004-09-26 6:46 [Bug fortran/17675] New: Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-16 15:48 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-16 16:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-16 16:13 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
` (2 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-16 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16 16:08 -------
This is now fixed right?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE
2004-09-26 6:46 [Bug fortran/17675] New: Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-16 16:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-16 16:13 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-01-16 23:17 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-01-16 23:21 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2005-01-16 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-01-16 16:13 -------
Subject: Re: [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16
> 16:08 -------
> This is now fixed right?
Should know in a couple of hours. I have builds going on
hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 and hppa64-hp-hpux11.11.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE
2004-09-26 6:46 [Bug fortran/17675] New: Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-16 16:13 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
@ 2005-01-16 23:17 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-01-16 23:21 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2005-01-16 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-01-16 23:17 -------
Subject: Re: [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints
> > ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16
> > 16:08 -------
> > This is now fixed right?
>
> Should know in a couple of hours. I have builds going on
> hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 and hppa64-hp-hpux11.11.
Yes.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE
2004-09-26 6:46 [Bug fortran/17675] New: Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-16 23:17 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
@ 2005-01-16 23:21 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-16 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16 23:21 -------
Fixed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread