From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-125761-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21480 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2005 15:47:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21469 invoked by uid 48); 10 Jan 2005 15:47:07 -0000
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:47:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20050110154707.21468.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "dje at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20041130171205.18742.lindig@cs.uni-sb.de>
References: <20041130171205.18742.lindig@cs.uni-sb.de>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/18742] small struct not passed correctly as vararg
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg01242.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-10 15:47 -------
The testcases work correctly on AIX and powerpc64-linux, so this likely is due
to Darwin not implementing consistent aggregate padding rules in GCC for
backward compatibility.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18742