From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14175 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2005 05:49:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13918 invoked by uid 48); 12 Jan 2005 05:49:09 -0000 Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 05:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050112054909.13917.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050110021617.19353.gschafer@zip.com.au> References: <20050110021617.19353.gschafer@zip.com.au> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug driver/19353] Faulty handling of startfile_prefix_spec X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg01457.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-12 05:49 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > BTW, at first glance, the patch you posted cannot possibly be correct. An "if" > statement was removed but the following "else if" statement was left in place. > Then again, I could be wrong coz I haven't tested the patch. oh, it only compiles because there is an if before but you are right, that "else if" should have been changed to an if. thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19353