From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18809 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2005 09:54:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18715 invoked by uid 48); 12 Jan 2005 09:54:48 -0000 Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050112095448.18714.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "rth at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050112063239.19391.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050112063239.19391.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/19391] [4.0 Regression] missed optimization with size of 8 vectors X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg01478.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-12 09:54 ------- Try again with functions. It is absolutely ESSENTIAL that we do NOT emit mmx vector operations UNLESS the routines are used. Doing so without the compiler also being able to insert emms instructions is wrong-code. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19391