From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6698 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2005 00:38:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6669 invoked by uid 48); 13 Jan 2005 00:38:07 -0000 Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 00:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050113003807.6668.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050112234624.19417.cort@fsmlabs.com> References: <20050112234624.19417.cort@fsmlabs.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/19417] return value of some functions not properly set (in r3) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg01618.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-13 00:38 ------- Oh, now I see the problem, we are using r0 twice which is just wrong. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|critical |normal Component|c |middle-end Keywords| |wrong-code Priority|P1 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19417