public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug optimization/6588] throw() takes 20,000 cycles : is it expected ?
       [not found] <20020506163600.6588.sylvain.pion@sophia.inria.fr>
@ 2003-05-25  4:22 ` dhazeghi@yahoo.com
  2003-08-05 15:22 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
  2005-01-13 21:23 ` [Bug other/6588] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: dhazeghi@yahoo.com @ 2003-05-25  4:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6588



------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com  2003-05-25 04:17 -------
Hello,

I can confirm that this problem is still present on gcc 3.2, 3.3 branch and mainline (20030524). 
Takes ~18 seconds on a P-III 733MHZ...

Dara





------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug optimization/6588] throw() takes 20,000 cycles : is it expected ?
       [not found] <20020506163600.6588.sylvain.pion@sophia.inria.fr>
  2003-05-25  4:22 ` [Bug optimization/6588] throw() takes 20,000 cycles : is it expected ? dhazeghi@yahoo.com
@ 2003-08-05 15:22 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
  2005-01-13 21:23 ` [Bug other/6588] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2003-08-05 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6588


pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |SUSPENDED


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-08-05 15:22 -------
Suspending this as the same reason for changing this to an enhancement.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/6588] throw() takes 20,000 cycles : is it expected ?
       [not found] <20020506163600.6588.sylvain.pion@sophia.inria.fr>
  2003-05-25  4:22 ` [Bug optimization/6588] throw() takes 20,000 cycles : is it expected ? dhazeghi@yahoo.com
  2003-08-05 15:22 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
@ 2005-01-13 21:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-13 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-13 21:23 -------
Hmm, this is one of the cases where we should be able optimize away really but the general case we 
can try to.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|rtl-optimization            |other
   Last reconfirmed|2004-02-08 05:35:11         |2005-01-13 21:23:12
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6588


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/6588] throw() takes 20,000 cycles : is it expected ?
       [not found] <bug-6588-1902@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2009-04-08 23:10 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
@ 2009-04-09 10:06 ` sylvain dot pion at sophia dot inria dot fr
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: sylvain dot pion at sophia dot inria dot fr @ 2009-04-09 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #9 from sylvain dot pion at sophia dot inria dot fr  2009-04-09 10:06 -------
There seems to have been some progress : it now takes 6000-9000 cycles instead
of 20000.

This is 6000 with g++ 4.3.1 on a Fedora 10 x86_64 box, and 9000 on a MacBook
Pro with various g++ versions up to current mainline.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6588


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/6588] throw() takes 20,000 cycles : is it expected ?
       [not found] <bug-6588-1902@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2009-04-08 23:10 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
  2009-04-09 10:06 ` sylvain dot pion at sophia dot inria dot fr
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at gmail dot com @ 2009-04-08 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #8 from bangerth at gmail dot com  2009-04-08 23:10 -------
We're about 8 generations of gcc later now. Is this still true? Still
20,000 cycles?

W.


-- 

bangerth at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bangerth at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6588


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-09 10:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20020506163600.6588.sylvain.pion@sophia.inria.fr>
2003-05-25  4:22 ` [Bug optimization/6588] throw() takes 20,000 cycles : is it expected ? dhazeghi@yahoo.com
2003-08-05 15:22 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2005-01-13 21:23 ` [Bug other/6588] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <bug-6588-1902@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2009-04-08 23:10 ` bangerth at gmail dot com
2009-04-09 10:06 ` sylvain dot pion at sophia dot inria dot fr

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).