public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/19443] New: log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran
@ 2005-01-14 12:57 mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
2005-01-14 13:05 ` [Bug fortran/19443] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 more replies)
0 siblings, 16 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil @ 2005-01-14 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The log10 operator in gfortran (cygwin build 20041213) does not work properly if
the statement is operated on a variable, but it works fine when operating on a
constant. The plain log statement works fine regardless. If the following
program is executed, one can observer that log for the two methods generates the
same value, but log10 using the different methods produces different results.
The 10*log10(tst) appears to generate -Infinity, where it should generate -50.
program test
implicit none
real :: tst
tst=1e-5
write(*,*) 10*log(1e-5), 10*log(tst)
write(*,*) 10*log10(1e-5), 10*log10(tst)
end program test
--
Summary: log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19443
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19443] log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran
2005-01-14 12:57 [Bug fortran/19443] New: log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
@ 2005-01-14 13:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-14 13:20 ` mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-14 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-14 13:04 -------
This works for me on ppc-darwin, are you sure that is not a bug in cygwin as fortran just calls log10f
(which might call log10 if your target does not have the C99 math functions).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19443
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19443] log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran
2005-01-14 12:57 [Bug fortran/19443] New: log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
2005-01-14 13:05 ` [Bug fortran/19443] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-14 13:20 ` mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
2005-01-14 13:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil @ 2005-01-14 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil 2005-01-14 13:20 -------
I tried the exact same code with g95 on cygwin, and it worked flawlessly.
gfortran must have access to the math library because it is able to evaluate log
properly, right? How do you suggest that I go about determining whether it is a
cygwin bug or gfortran bug?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19443
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19443] log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran
2005-01-14 12:57 [Bug fortran/19443] New: log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
2005-01-14 13:05 ` [Bug fortran/19443] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-14 13:20 ` mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
@ 2005-01-14 13:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-14 13:35 ` mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-14 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-14 13:25 -------
Try this c code:
#include <math.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
printf("%f\n", 10*log10(1.0e-5));
return 0;
}
It might also be the bug that isfinite does not work on cygwin which is a different bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19443
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19443] log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran
2005-01-14 12:57 [Bug fortran/19443] New: log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-14 13:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-14 13:35 ` mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
2005-01-14 13:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil @ 2005-01-14 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil 2005-01-14 13:34 -------
That c code above worked properly, and running g95 on my test code works fine
also, so I think that pretty much indicates that the issue is with gfortran.
and gfortran works fine when i do log10(1e-5), but fails on tst=1e-5;
log10(tst). so it partially works.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19443
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19443] log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran
2005-01-14 12:57 [Bug fortran/19443] New: log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-14 13:35 ` mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
@ 2005-01-14 13:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-14 13:42 ` mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-14 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-14 13:38 -------
Hmm, try this (if might be that log10f is broken):
#include <math.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
float t = 1.0e-5;
printf("%f\n", 10*log10f(t));
return 0;
}
If this does not link (try -lm), otherwise I don't know where the bug is.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19443
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19443] log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran
2005-01-14 12:57 [Bug fortran/19443] New: log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-14 13:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-14 13:42 ` mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
2005-01-14 13:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil @ 2005-01-14 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil 2005-01-14 13:42 -------
That code works properly also. I'm downloading an older snapshot of cygwin
gfortran to see if the bug is in there also.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19443
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19443] log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran
2005-01-14 12:57 [Bug fortran/19443] New: log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-14 13:42 ` mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
@ 2005-01-14 13:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-14 16:51 ` mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-14 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-14 13:51 -------
Then this might be a dup of bug 19363, if both of those C programs worked.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19443
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19443] log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran
2005-01-14 12:57 [Bug fortran/19443] New: log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-14 13:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-14 16:51 ` mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
2005-01-17 22:59 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil @ 2005-01-14 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil 2005-01-14 16:51 -------
My test code works perfectly with the 20041114 cygwin gfortran and earlier
snapshots.
I agree, this could be related to #19363 since the dates of working/non-working
code are similar. I guess your best bet would be to track down what changes
between 20041114 and 20041212 could cause the errors we're seeing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19443
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19443] log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran
2005-01-14 12:57 [Bug fortran/19443] New: log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-14 16:51 ` mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
@ 2005-01-17 22:59 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-17 23:01 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-17 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-17 22:58 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> I tried the exact same code with g95 on cygwin, and it worked flawlessly.
> gfortran must have access to the math library because it is able to evaluate log
> properly, right? How do you suggest that I go about determining whether it is a
> cygwin bug or gfortran bug?
As a data point, I recall that g95 actually implements its own log10 function,
so cygwin might still be broken.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19443
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19443] log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran
2005-01-14 12:57 [Bug fortran/19443] New: log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-17 22:59 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-17 23:01 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-25 9:45 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-17 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-17 23:01 -------
This will teach me not reading all comments. If it did work two months ago it is
indeed more likely that cygwin is not the point of failure.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19443
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19443] log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran
2005-01-14 12:57 [Bug fortran/19443] New: log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-17 23:01 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-25 9:45 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2005-01-31 4:38 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr @ 2005-01-25 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-01-25 09:45 -------
I am sorry, I missed this thread completely:
I think that this is a problem with gfortran's log10(real*4).
The following works correctly with the gcc built at the same time as gfortran -
gcc (GCC) 4.0.0 20050117 (experimental):
#include <math.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main (void)
{
float tst4 = 1.0e-5;
double tst8 = 1.0e-5;
printf ("Literal ....%f\n", 10*log10 (1.0e-5));
printf ("Float.......%f\n", 10*log10 (tst4));
printf ("Double......%f\n", 10*log10 (tst8));
return 0;
}
program test
implicit none
REAL*4 :: tst4
real*8 :: tst8
tst4 = 1e-5_4
tst8 = 1e-5_8
write (*,*) "log with real*4 ......", 10*log (1e-5_4), 10*log (tst4)
write (*,*) "log with real*8 ......", 10*log (1e-5_8), 10*log (tst8)
write (*,*) "log10 with real*4 ....", 10*log10 (1e-5_4), 10*log10 (tst4)
write (*,*) "log10 with real*8 ....", 10*log10 (1e-5_8), 10*log10 (tst8)
end program test
log with real*4 ...... -115.1292 -115.1292
log with real*8 ...... -115.129254649702 -115.129254649702
log10 with real*4 .... -50.00000 -Infinity
log10 with real*8 .... -50.0000000000000 -50.0000000000000
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19443
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19443] log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran
2005-01-14 12:57 [Bug fortran/19443] New: log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-25 9:45 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
@ 2005-01-31 4:38 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2005-02-07 22:52 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu @ 2005-01-31 4:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2005-01-31 04:38 -------
Paul,
Your code on i386-*-freebsd produces
kargl[233] ./log
log with real*4 ...... -115.1292 -115.1293
log with real*8 ...... -115.129254649702 -115.129254649702
log10 with real*4 .... -50.00000 -50.00000
log10 with real*8 .... -50.0000000000000 -50.0000000000000
kargl[234] gfc -o log -O2 log.f90
kargl[235] ./log
log with real*4 ...... -115.1292 -115.1293
log with real*8 ...... -115.129254649702 -115.129254649702
log10 with real*4 .... -50.00000 -50.00000
log10 with real*8 .... -50.0000000000000 -50.0000000000000
This is probably target specific.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19443
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19443] log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran
2005-01-14 12:57 [Bug fortran/19443] New: log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-31 4:38 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
@ 2005-02-07 22:52 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-07 23:09 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-07 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-07 15:10 -------
Can you compile those tests with -fdump-tree-original and look at the
.t02.original dump to determine what functions the C frontend calls, and what
functions the Fortran frontend calls?
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19443
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19443] log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran
2005-01-14 12:57 [Bug fortran/19443] New: log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-07 22:52 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-07 23:09 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-04 18:01 ` mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
2005-03-13 17:28 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-07 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-07 15:12 -------
ps it seems that you'll have to use the -fdump-tree-gimple flag for C and look
at the .t08.gimple dump to get something readable.
On i686-pc-linux the C code calls log10, whereas the Fortran code calls
__buitlin_log10. I would be surprised if the built-in were only broken on some
operating systems, but you'll never know.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19443
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19443] log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran
2005-01-14 12:57 [Bug fortran/19443] New: log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2005-02-07 23:09 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-04 18:01 ` mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
2005-03-13 17:28 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil @ 2005-03-04 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil 2005-03-04 18:01 -------
I updated all cygwin packages recently as well as gfortran before the hd crash
and ensuing lack of cygwin build on gfortran.org. However, I just got around to
testing the code again. It appears that everything works correctly now.
$ gfc --version
GNU Fortran 95 (GCC 4.0.0 20050131 (experimental))
Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
$ cat log_test.f90
program test
implicit none
REAL*4 :: tst4
real*8 :: tst8
tst4 = 1e-5_4
tst8 = 1e-5_8
write (*,*) "log with real*4 ......", 10*log (1e-5_4), 10*log (tst4)
write (*,*) "log with real*8 ......", 10*log (1e-5_8), 10*log (tst8)
write (*,*) "log10 with real*4 ....", 10*log10 (1e-5_4), 10*log10 (tst4)
write (*,*) "log10 with real*8 ....", 10*log10 (1e-5_8), 10*log10 (tst8)
end program test
$ gfc -o log_test log_test.f90 && ./log_test
log with real*4 ...... -115.1292 -115.1292
log with real*8 ...... -115.129254649702 -115.129254649702
log10 with real*4 .... -50.00000 -50.00000
log10 with real*8 .... -50.0000000000000 -50.0000000000000
The "-fdump-tree-gimple" flag doesn't appear to be available for gcc 3.3.3. For
your reference, here is the gfc .original file
$ gfc -fdump-tree-original log_test.f90
$ cat log_test.f90.t02.orginal
MAIN__ ()
{
real4 tst4;
real8 tst8;
tst4 = 9.99999974737875163555145263671875e-6;
tst8 = 1.00000000000000008180305391403130954586231382564e-5;
_gfortran_filename = "log_test.f90";
_gfortran_line = 7;
_gfortran_ioparm.unit = 6;
_gfortran_ioparm.list_format = 1;
_gfortran_st_write ();
_gfortran_transfer_character ("log with real*4 ......", 22);
{
real4 C.452 = -1.1512924957275390625e+2;
_gfortran_transfer_real (&C.452, 4);
}
{
real4 D.453;
D.453 = __builtin_logf (tst4) * 1.0e+1;
_gfortran_transfer_real (&D.453, 4);
}
_gfortran_st_write_done ();
_gfortran_filename = "log_test.f90";
_gfortran_line = 8;
_gfortran_ioparm.unit = 6;
_gfortran_ioparm.list_format = 1;
_gfortran_st_write ();
_gfortran_transfer_character ("log with real*8 ......", 22);
{
real8 C.454 = -1.15129254649702289725610171444714069366455078125e+2;
_gfortran_transfer_real (&C.454, 8);
}
{
real8 D.455;
D.455 = __builtin_log (tst8) * 1.0e+1;
_gfortran_transfer_real (&D.455, 8);
}
_gfortran_st_write_done ();
_gfortran_filename = "log_test.f90";
_gfortran_line = 9;
_gfortran_ioparm.unit = 6;
_gfortran_ioparm.list_format = 1;
_gfortran_st_write ();
_gfortran_transfer_character ("log10 with real*4 ....", 22);
{
real4 C.456 = -5.0e+1;
_gfortran_transfer_real (&C.456, 4);
}
{
real4 D.457;
D.457 = __builtin_log10f (tst4) * 1.0e+1;
_gfortran_transfer_real (&D.457, 4);
}
_gfortran_st_write_done ();
_gfortran_filename = "log_test.f90";
_gfortran_line = 10;
_gfortran_ioparm.unit = 6;
_gfortran_ioparm.list_format = 1;
_gfortran_st_write ();
_gfortran_transfer_character ("log10 with real*8 ....", 22);
{
real8 C.458 = -5.0e+1;
_gfortran_transfer_real (&C.458, 8);
}
{
real8 D.459;
D.459 = __builtin_log10 (tst8) * 1.0e+1;
_gfortran_transfer_real (&D.459, 8);
}
_gfortran_st_write_done ();
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19443
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19443] log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran
2005-01-14 12:57 [Bug fortran/19443] New: log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2005-03-04 18:01 ` mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
@ 2005-03-13 17:28 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-13 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-13 17:28 -------
Closed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19443
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-13 17:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-01-14 12:57 [Bug fortran/19443] New: log10 statement does not work properly in gfortran mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
2005-01-14 13:05 ` [Bug fortran/19443] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-14 13:20 ` mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
2005-01-14 13:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-14 13:35 ` mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
2005-01-14 13:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-14 13:42 ` mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
2005-01-14 13:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-14 16:51 ` mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
2005-01-17 22:59 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-17 23:01 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-25 9:45 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2005-01-31 4:38 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2005-02-07 22:52 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-07 23:09 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-04 18:01 ` mgilbert at airborne dot nrl dot navy dot mil
2005-03-13 17:28 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).