From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30716 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2005 16:49:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30662 invoked by uid 48); 15 Jan 2005 16:49:23 -0000 Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050115164923.30661.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050115123233.19457.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050115123233.19457.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/19457] [4.0 Regression] Warning depends on cached constant X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg02007.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15 16:49 ------- Confirmed, I have been wondering where this warning was coming from. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Known to fail| |4.0.0 Known to work| |3.3.2 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-01-15 16:49:22 date| | Summary|Warning depends on cached |[4.0 Regression] Warning |constant |depends on cached constant Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19457