From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32365 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2005 01:54:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31797 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jan 2005 01:54:11 -0000 Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 01:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050116015411.31794.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050106195542.19300.christian.joensson@gmail.com> References: <20050106195542.19300.christian.joensson@gmail.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg02073.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16 01:54 ------- I cannot decide if I should put this in C++ or debug component based on: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg00871.html But if it was broken by the patch referenced in that email then the testresults does not make sense back from April since that patch only went in September. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|other |c++ Keywords| |wrong-debug http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300