public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "schlie at comcast dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/18065] usual arithmetic conversion not applying correctly
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 07:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050116071657.14954.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041019202143.18065.schlie@comcast.net>


------- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net  2005-01-16 07:16 -------
Subject: Re:  usual arithmetic conversion not
 applying correctly

Wonder if this PR could still be considered a missed optimization, as the
present logic which determines if an / or % expression's operands may be
shortened, misses the case where if the lhs operand is a constant, it may
be verified as not being INT_MIN; as if it's not, then it's impossible for
the operation to overflow, i.e. INT_MIN / -1  => INT_MAX+1, therefore
may be shortened. As noted as being absent in it's comment on shortening:

  /* Although it would be tempting to shorten always here, that loses
     on some targets, since the modulo instruction is undefined if the
     quotient can't be represented in the computation mode.  We shorten
     only if unsigned or if dividing by something we know != -1.  */

> From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
> Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/18065] usual arithmetic conversion not
> applying correctly
> 
> -- 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>            Severity|normal                      |enhancement
>            Priority|P1                          |P3
> 
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18065




-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18065


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-01-16  7:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-19 20:22 [Bug c/18065] New: wrong built-in functions selected schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-19 20:27 ` [Bug c/18065] " schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-19 20:39 ` [Bug target/18065] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-19 21:18 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-19 21:31 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-19 21:39 ` [Bug target/18065] not using qi version of divmod pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-19 21:53 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-19 22:08 ` ericw at evcohs dot com
2004-10-19 22:31 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-19 23:13 ` ericw at evcohs dot com
2004-10-20 18:34 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-20 18:50 ` [Bug c/18065] usual arithmetic conversion not applying correctly pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-20 19:14 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-20 19:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-20 19:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-20 19:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-20 19:33 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-20 19:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-20 21:19 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-20 21:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-20 21:31 ` jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
2004-10-20 21:46 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-20 22:27 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-20 22:31 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18065] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-20 22:42 ` jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
2004-10-20 23:03 ` jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
2004-10-20 23:28 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-21  1:04 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-21  1:28 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-21 12:47 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-12-21 20:50 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2005-01-16  1:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-16  7:17 ` schlie at comcast dot net [this message]
2005-01-16 17:39 ` schlie at comcast dot net
     [not found] <bug-18065-9497@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-09-14  7:06 ` abnikant dot singh at atmel dot com
2010-09-14  7:13 ` abnikant dot singh at atmel dot com
     [not found] <bug-18065-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-05-24 14:03 ` peter777778 at hotmail dot co.uk
2012-05-24 14:04 ` peter777778 at hotmail dot co.uk
2012-05-24 14:05 ` peter777778 at hotmail dot co.uk
2012-05-24 14:23 ` peter777778 at hotmail dot co.uk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050116071657.14954.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).