From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10992 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2005 23:25:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10959 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jan 2005 23:25:52 -0000 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 23:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050117232552.10958.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050117231845.19493.schwab@suse.de> References: <20050117231845.19493.schwab@suse.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/19493] [4.0 regression] TImode no longer supported on powerpc X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg02328.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-17 23:25 ------- Actually this is not a regression TImode was never really supported on ppc. If you did the following on a 3.4 compiler it would ICE: void main (void) { typedef unsigned __uint128_t __attribute__ (( __mode__ (__TI__))); __uint128_t x,a,w; x=a*w+a-w/a; } So we just reject the code before we ICE which is better than ICEing. Really any place which used TI mode should be changed because TI mode was never supported on ppc- * (now ppc64 is a different story). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19493