From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32741 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2005 00:40:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32695 invoked by uid 48); 18 Jan 2005 00:39:58 -0000 Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050118003958.32693.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031110230703.13000.cheng@powertv.com> References: <20031110230703.13000.cheng@powertv.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4/4.0 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Using -O2 cannot detect missing return statement in a function X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg02338.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-18 00:39 ------- Hmm, This seems like a place where the tree-profiling branch can come in handing as we always produce the CFG for all functions even the ones which we inline and don't emit. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13000