From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19751 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2005 07:43:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19684 invoked by uid 48); 18 Jan 2005 07:43:31 -0000 Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 07:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050118074331.19682.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041122223809.18615.debian-gcc@lists.debian.org> References: <20041122223809.18615.debian-gcc@lists.debian.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/18615] biarch bootstrap fails on sparc-linux (CVS 20041121) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg02359.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-18 07:43 ------- > sucessfully bootstrapped, test results at > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-01/msg00805.html Great! The number of Ada failures is unexpected though, maybe related to the change of calling conventions for complex types. Btw, if the machine is available for some more hours, it would also be nice to test both architectures in a row, with make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix{,-m64}" ('\' might be required before the '{' and '}', depending on the shell) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18615