From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28308 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2005 12:22:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27740 invoked by uid 48); 18 Jan 2005 12:22:07 -0000 Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050118122207.27739.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "uros at kss-loka dot si" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050112133406.19398.uros@kss-loka.si> References: <20050112133406.19398.uros@kss-loka.si> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/19398] secondary reloads don't consider "m" alternatives X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg02403.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-01-18 12:22 ------- The solution with peepholes is here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg01473.html However, it was suggested that fixing reload is a better approach. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19398