From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2982 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2005 02:35:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2818 invoked by uid 48); 19 Jan 2005 02:35:51 -0000 Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 02:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050119023551.2817.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "rth at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050119003732.19521.stuart@apple.com> References: <20050119003732.19521.stuart@apple.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/19521] [4.0 Regression] omitted stab for gcov initialization function X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg02566.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 02:35 ------- So the bug is the end stab without the start stab? Or do you think that this bit of code that corresponds not at all to any user code should have full stabs? If the later, why? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19521