From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20416 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2005 03:47:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20043 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2005 03:46:35 -0000 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 03:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050121034635.20042.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050120222246.19551.billingd@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050120222246.19551.billingd@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/19551] LAPACK routine claic1.f bug X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg02961.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au 2005-01-21 03:46 ------- Subject: RE: LAPACK routine claic1.f bug Pardon? It is a self contained example. Took me several hours to reduce it. I doubt it is an excess precision problem as the numbers involved are all O(1) and there is no possibility of cancellation. David NOTICE This e-mail and any attachments are private and confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an authorised recipient, the copying or distribution of this e-mail and any attachments is prohibited and you must not read, print or act in reliance on this e-mail or attachments. This notice should not be removed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19551