From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2147 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2005 08:15:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1686 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jan 2005 08:14:46 -0000 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050121081446.1685.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041128004431.18698.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20041128004431.18698.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/18698] [3.4/4.0 regression] Error message using "using" for code not using "using" ;-) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg02978.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-21 08:14 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > The error message shows 'using-declaration' while it > is actually an 'access-declaration' (section 11.3 in > the standard). But it looks like GCC does not differentiate between them when reporting a bug. Also shouldn't we warn about access-declaration as they are deprecated? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18698