From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4182 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2005 08:17:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3692 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jan 2005 08:16:46 -0000 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:17:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050121081646.3691.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041128004431.18698.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20041128004431.18698.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/18698] [3.4/4.0 regression] Error message using "using" for code not using "using" ;-) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg02979.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-21 08:16 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > But it looks like GCC does not differentiate between them when reporting a bug. s/bug/error/ A way to have GCC to differeentiate them is to add an argument to do_class_using_decl. And pass that code in parser for "Access declaration" is for "Access declaration" and not for using-declaration. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18698