From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14511 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2005 17:09:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14402 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jan 2005 17:09:19 -0000 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050121170919.14401.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "hp at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050115184713.19461.hp@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050115184713.19461.hp@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/19461] hidden __eprintf referenced by DSO, gas+gld X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg03066.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-21 17:09 ------- Following up on comment #18, no GNU ld *is* used, it's just that adding -print-prog-name=ld to the failing link says "/usr/ccs/bin/ld". An otherwise harmless bug, likely a WONTFIX. :-) But that's another bug. (There is no other ld in the newly build search path; what's used is the link collect-ld, which points to ../ld/ld-new.) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19461