From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24625 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2005 19:43:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24602 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2005 19:43:56 -0000 Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050122194356.24599.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050119095203.19528.corsepiu@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050119095203.19528.corsepiu@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/19528] [4.0 regression] missing ra.h X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg03200.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-01-22 19:43 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] missing ra.h joel at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From joel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-22 12:57 ------- > (In reply to comment #10) > >>Mark, while you're using your RM powers to move the target milestone on >>this one, could you also please use your GWP powers to approve the simple >>patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg01258.html that fixes >>this bug? >> > > > I can confirm that sh-rtems builds with this patch and won't without it. > The resulting compiler will also build RTEMS. > > No sh target builds without this fix so I am also politely asking this to > be committed. The patch should says "Returns true" rather than "Returns 1" in the comment; OK with that change. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19528