From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15319 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2005 14:58:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15270 invoked by uid 48); 23 Jan 2005 14:58:09 -0000 Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050123145809.15269.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041106163946.18316.steven@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20041106163946.18316.steven@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/18316] Missed IV optimization X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg03294.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-23 14:58 ------- hmm... ivopts definitely are not the responsible for this, and I am fairly suprised that this is fixed; could you please check what's happening? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18316