public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/19367] New: 4.0: ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using'
@ 2005-01-10 21:39 gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-10 21:56 ` [Bug debug/19367] [4.0 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (11 more replies)
  0 siblings, 12 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-10 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



g++ dies with a tree check ICE when the source below is compiled with -g:

$ cc1plus  -g x.cc
 void foo()

x.cc:6: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class 'declaration', have 'exceptional' (@@dummy) in lookup_decl_die, at dwarf2out.c:5415
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
$

Environment:
System: Linux karma 2.6.8.1 #20 Mon Sep 13 23:48:47 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Architecture: i686

	<machine, os, target, libraries (multiple lines)>
host: i686-pc-linux-gnu
build: i686-pc-linux-gnu
target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
configured with: /home/sss/gcc/gcc/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc --enable-threads=posix --enable-long-long --enable-languages=c,c++,f95

How-To-Repeat:

Compile with -g:

----------------------------------------
int toupper (int);
namespace std {   using ::toupper; }

void foo()
{
  using std::toupper;
}


----------------------------------------
------- Additional Comments From snyder at fnal dot gov  2005-01-10 21:39 -------
Fix:
	<how to correct or work around the problem, if known (multiple lines)>

-- 
           Summary: 4.0: ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local
                    `using'
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: critical
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: snyder at fnal dot gov
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19367


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug debug/19367] [4.0 Regression] ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using'
  2005-01-10 21:39 [Bug c++/19367] New: 4.0: ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using' gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-10 21:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-10 22:55   ` Daniel Berlin
  2005-01-10 22:55 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-10 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-10 21:56 -------
Confirmed, I think this is the boost ICE.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
          Component|c++                         |debug
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-valid-code
           Priority|P2                          |P1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2005-01-10 21:56:54
               date|                            |
            Summary|4.0: ICE: tree_check in     |[4.0 Regression] ICE:
                   |lookup_local_die with local |tree_check in
                   |`using'                     |lookup_local_die with local
                   |                            |`using'
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.0.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19367


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug debug/19367] [4.0 Regression] ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using'
  2005-01-10 21:56 ` [Bug debug/19367] [4.0 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-10 22:55   ` Daniel Berlin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2005-01-10 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org; +Cc: gcc-bugs



On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

>
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-10 21:56 -------
> Confirmed, I think this is the boost ICE.
>

This happens because the orig_decl that we are trying to use in emitting 
the using decl info appears to have been trashed or garbage collected 
before we emit it.

I think i know why.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug debug/19367] [4.0 Regression] ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using'
  2005-01-10 21:39 [Bug c++/19367] New: 4.0: ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using' gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-10 21:56 ` [Bug debug/19367] [4.0 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-10 22:55 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
  2005-01-11  0:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: dberlin at dberlin dot org @ 2005-01-10 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-10 22:55 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.0 Regression] ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die
 with local `using'



On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

>
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-10 21:56 -------
> Confirmed, I think this is the boost ICE.
>

This happens because the orig_decl that we are trying to use in emitting 
the using decl info appears to have been trashed or garbage collected 
before we emit it.

I think i know why.



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19367


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug debug/19367] [4.0 Regression] ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using'
  2005-01-10 21:39 [Bug c++/19367] New: 4.0: ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using' gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-10 21:56 ` [Bug debug/19367] [4.0 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-10 22:55 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
@ 2005-01-11  0:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-11  1:32 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-11  0:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-11 00:53 -------
The ICE was introduced with:
        * decl.c (duplicate_decls): Call ggc_free on declarations we will
        not be needing any longer.

But it looks like reverting it might be papering over the overall problem.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19367


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug debug/19367] [4.0 Regression] ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using'
  2005-01-10 21:39 [Bug c++/19367] New: 4.0: ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using' gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-11  0:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-11  1:32 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
  2005-01-11  1:36 ` [Bug c++/19367] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2005-01-11  1:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it  2005-01-11 01:32 -------
For the log, this is blocking utility/assert_test and 
utility/current_function_test in Boost.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19367


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/19367] [4.0 Regression] ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using'
  2005-01-10 21:39 [Bug c++/19367] New: 4.0: ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using' gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-11  1:32 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2005-01-11  1:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-11  1:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-11  1:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-11 01:36 -------
Something is really wrong here.
If we take the following TU:
void abort (void);
namespace std {   using ::abort;  }
void foo()
{
  using std::abort;
  abort();
}

We output a call to std::abort which does not exist at all.  Why are we doing that.
I think this is what is causing us to ICE in the first place.
With 3.4.0 and 3.3.x, we get a call to extern "C" abort which seems right but I think it is wrong still.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org, mmitchel at gcc dot gnu
                   |                            |dot org
          Component|debug                       |c++


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19367


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/19367] [4.0 Regression] ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using'
  2005-01-10 21:39 [Bug c++/19367] New: 4.0: ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using' gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-11  1:36 ` [Bug c++/19367] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-11  1:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-19 18:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-11  1:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-11 01:42 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
One more note here, the mangling change happened between 20040620 and 20040622.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19367


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/19367] [4.0 Regression] ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using'
  2005-01-10 21:39 [Bug c++/19367] New: 4.0: ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using' gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-11  1:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-19 18:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-25 16:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-19 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-19 18:41 -------
*** Bug 19536 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |micis at gmx dot de


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19367


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/19367] [4.0 Regression] ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using'
  2005-01-10 21:39 [Bug c++/19367] New: 4.0: ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using' gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-19 18:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-25 16:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-31  2:11 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-25 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-25 16:10 -------
*** Bug 19622 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jan at etpmod dot phys dot
                   |                            |tue dot nl


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19367


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/19367] [4.0 Regression] ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using'
  2005-01-10 21:39 [Bug c++/19367] New: 4.0: ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using' gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-25 16:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-31  2:11 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-31  4:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-31  2:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |mark at codesourcery dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19367


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/19367] [4.0 Regression] ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using'
  2005-01-10 21:39 [Bug c++/19367] New: 4.0: ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using' gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-31  2:11 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-31  4:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-31  4:13 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-02-28 15:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-31  4:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-31 04:07 -------
Subject: Bug 19367

CVSROOT:	/cvs/gcc
Module name:	gcc
Changes by:	mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org	2005-01-31 04:07:41

Modified files:
	gcc/cp         : ChangeLog decl.c name-lookup.c 
	gcc/testsuite  : ChangeLog 
Added files:
	gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse: error24.C 
	gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup: builtin1.C 

Log message:
	PR c++/19395
	* decl.c (grokdeclarator): Refactor code so that qualified names
	are never allowed as the declarator in a typedef.
	
	PR c++/19367
	* name-lookup.c (do_nonmember_using_decl): Avoid overloading
	builtin declarations.
	
	PR c++/19395
	* g++.dg/parse/error24.C: New test.
	
	PR c++/19367
	* g++.dg/lookup/builtin1.C: New test.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4602&r2=1.4603
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/decl.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1355&r2=1.1356
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.107&r2=1.108
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4960&r2=1.4961
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error24.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/builtin1.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19367


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/19367] [4.0 Regression] ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using'
  2005-01-10 21:39 [Bug c++/19367] New: 4.0: ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using' gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-31  4:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-31  4:13 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-02-28 15:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-31  4:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-31 04:13 -------
Fixed in GCC 4.0.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19367


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/19367] [4.0 Regression] ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using'
  2005-01-10 21:39 [Bug c++/19367] New: 4.0: ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using' gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-31  4:13 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-28 15:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-28 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-02-28 08:27 -------
Subject: Bug 19367

CVSROOT:	/cvs/gcc
Module name:	gcc
Branch: 	gcc-3_4-rhl-branch
Changes by:	jakub@gcc.gnu.org	2005-02-28 08:26:41

Modified files:
	gcc/cp         : ChangeLog 
	gcc/testsuite  : ChangeLog 
	gcc/cp         : name-lookup.c 
Added files:
	gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup: builtin1.C builtin2.C 

Log message:
	PR c++/18838
	2005-01-30  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
	PR c++/19367
	* name-lookup.c (do_nonmember_using_decl): Avoid overloading
	builtin declarations.
	
	PR c++/18838
	* g++.dg/lookup/builtin2.C: New test.
	2005-01-30  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
	PR c++/19367
	* g++.dg/lookup/builtin1.C: New test.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-rhl-branch&r1=1.3892.2.99.2.24&r2=1.3892.2.99.2.25
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-rhl-branch&r1=1.3389.2.170.2.45&r2=1.3389.2.170.2.46
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-rhl-branch&r1=1.34.2.11.2.8&r2=1.34.2.11.2.9
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/builtin1.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-rhl-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.18.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/builtin2.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-rhl-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19367


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-02-28  8:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-01-10 21:39 [Bug c++/19367] New: 4.0: ICE: tree_check in lookup_local_die with local `using' gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-10 21:56 ` [Bug debug/19367] [4.0 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-10 22:55   ` Daniel Berlin
2005-01-10 22:55 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2005-01-11  0:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-11  1:32 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2005-01-11  1:36 ` [Bug c++/19367] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-11  1:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-19 18:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-25 16:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-31  2:11 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-31  4:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-31  4:13 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-28 15:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).