public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/18902] Naive (default) complex division algorithm
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050126093207.11414.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041209110756.18902.pcarlini@suse.de>
------- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2005-01-26 09:32 -------
The recent fixes in complex handling, and the
scaled division algorithm, have eliminated the
Lapack regressions with -O0 at least on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
(see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5900#c23 ).
This is a huge step. I think PR 18902 should now be considered
critical, at least for gfortran.
Thomas
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18902
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-26 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-09 11:08 [Bug middle-end/18902] New: " pcarlini at suse dot de
2004-12-09 11:09 ` [Bug middle-end/18902] " pcarlini at suse dot de
2004-12-09 11:17 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2004-12-09 11:26 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2004-12-09 11:33 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2004-12-09 11:46 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2004-12-09 13:02 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2004-12-09 13:25 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2004-12-09 13:32 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2004-12-09 16:04 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-12-23 23:05 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-12-23 23:22 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-01-20 10:45 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-20 11:50 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-01-20 12:11 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-01-21 20:23 ` toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
[not found] ` <18548577.1106258230876.JavaMail.root@dtm1eusosrv72.dtm.ops.eu.uu.net>
2005-01-21 20:23 ` Toon Moene
2005-01-24 2:32 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-25 18:26 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-26 9:32 ` Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de [this message]
2005-01-26 10:54 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-02-02 12:54 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2005-02-24 14:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-24 14:24 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-24 16:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-25 1:00 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-31 21:38 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050126093207.11414.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).