From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11505 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2005 09:32:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11415 invoked by uid 48); 26 Jan 2005 09:32:07 -0000 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:32:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050126093207.11414.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041209110756.18902.pcarlini@suse.de> References: <20041209110756.18902.pcarlini@suse.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/18902] Naive (default) complex division algorithm X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg03810.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2005-01-26 09:32 ------- The recent fixes in complex handling, and the scaled division algorithm, have eliminated the Lapack regressions with -O0 at least on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu (see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5900#c23 ). This is a huge step. I think PR 18902 should now be considered critical, at least for gfortran. Thomas -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18902