From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22776 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2005 15:26:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22722 invoked by uid 48); 26 Jan 2005 15:26:17 -0000 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050126152617.22719.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041214104244.18977.Thomas.Koenig@online.de> References: <20041214104244.18977.Thomas.Koenig@online.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/18977] LAPACK test xeigtsts segfaults with optimization X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg03868.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2005-01-26 15:26 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Is there a test case someone can attach to this bug? I'm working on it. The error vanishes if slasy2.f is compiled with -O0, which is at least a start. An equivalent error occurs in dlasy2.f, BTW, which also goes away if dlasy2.f is compiled with -O0. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18977