public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure
@ 2005-01-26 19:36 dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-26 20:52 ` [Bug target/19645] [4.0 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (11 more replies)
  0 siblings, 12 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-26 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

<rth> neat.  ppc64, 64-bit build gives
<rth> /usr/include/bits/stdio.h:59: internal compiler error: tree check:
  expected identifier_node, have error_mark in lookup_name, at c-decl.c:2532

-- 
           Summary: PPC64 64-bit build failure
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ice-checking
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P1
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: powerpc64-linux
  GCC host triplet: powerpc64-linux
GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/19645] [4.0 Regression] PPC64 64-bit build failure
  2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-26 20:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-26 21:05 ` [Bug target/19645] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-26 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |critical
            Summary|PPC64 64-bit build failure  |[4.0 Regression] PPC64 64-
                   |                            |bit build failure
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.0.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/19645] PPC64 64-bit build failure
  2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-26 20:52 ` [Bug target/19645] [4.0 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-26 21:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-27 17:43 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-26 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|critical                    |normal
           Keywords|                            |build, ice-on-valid-code
            Summary|[4.0 Regression] PPC64 64-  |PPC64 64-bit build failure
                   |bit build failure           |
   Target Milestone|4.0.0                       |---


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/19645] PPC64 64-bit build failure
  2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-26 20:52 ` [Bug target/19645] [4.0 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-26 21:05 ` [Bug target/19645] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-27 17:43 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-27 17:46 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-27 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/19645] PPC64 64-bit build failure
  2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-27 17:43 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-27 17:46 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-27 18:41 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-27 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-27 17:43 -------
I bootstrapped in 64-bit mode and did not encounter any checking failure.  Was
extra checking enabled?  I used SLES9 gcc-3_3-hammer as the bootstrap compiler.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/19645] PPC64 64-bit build failure
  2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-27 17:46 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-27 18:41 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-27 19:10 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-27 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-27 18:41 -------
No, no extra anything.  This is on a newly installed fedora core 4 system,
so glibc 2.3.4 and gcc 3.4.3-20050113 as bootstrap compiler.

I guess I'll try again and post a .i file if reproducible, or fix it.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/19645] PPC64 64-bit build failure
  2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-27 18:41 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-27 19:10 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com
  2005-01-27 20:38 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: dje at watson dot ibm dot com @ 2005-01-27 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From dje at watson dot ibm dot com  2005-01-27 19:09 -------
Subject: Re:  PPC64 64-bit build failure 

I configured with:

--build=powerpc64-linux --host=powerpc64-linux --target=powerpc64-linux
--with-cpu=default32 --enable-threads=posix --enable-shared
--enable-__cxa_atexit
--with-gcc-version-trigger=/home/dje/src/src/gcc/version.c
--enable-languages=c,c++

I am building everything with -m64.

Are you also adding -mcpu=G5?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/19645] PPC64 64-bit build failure
  2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-27 19:10 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com
@ 2005-01-27 20:38 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-27 21:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-27 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-27 20:34 -------
Subject: Re:  PPC64 64-bit build failure

On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 07:09:58PM -0000, dje at watson dot ibm dot com wrote:
> --build=powerpc64-linux --host=powerpc64-linux --target=powerpc64-linux
> --with-cpu=default32 --enable-threads=posix --enable-shared
> --enable-__cxa_atexit
> --with-gcc-version-trigger=/home/dje/src/src/gcc/version.c
> --enable-languages=c,c++

I'm using no special options.  In particular, no --with-cpu=default32.


r~


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/19645] PPC64 64-bit build failure
  2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-27 20:38 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-27 21:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-27 21:20 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-27 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-27 21:15 -------
--with-cpu=default32 builds 32bit by default IIRC.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/19645] PPC64 64-bit build failure
  2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-27 21:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-27 21:20 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com
  2005-01-28  0:18 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: dje at watson dot ibm dot com @ 2005-01-27 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From dje at watson dot ibm dot com  2005-01-27 21:20 -------
Subject: Re:  PPC64 64-bit build failure 

--with-cpu=default32 builds 32bit by default IIRC.

You obviously replied without reading my message.  I said, "I am building
everything with -m64".


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/19645] PPC64 64-bit build failure
  2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-27 21:20 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com
@ 2005-01-28  0:18 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-28  0:19 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-28  8:12 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-28  0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-28 00:18 -------
I bootstrapped again omitting --with-cpu=default32 and with -m64.  No problems.

I also built and installed gcc version 3.4.4 20050109 (prerelease) and used it
to bootstrap with -m64.  No problems.

--enable-threads=posix is the default for Linux, so that should not have any effect.

When I originally tried bootstrapping on PPC Linux, I had problems before I used
the incantation.  I do not remember if the failure was due to checking.  You
might try adding the following options to configure

--build=powerpc64-linux --host=powerpc64-linux --target=powerpc64-linux
--enable-shared --enable-__cxa_atexit

and see if that effects your results.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/19645] PPC64 64-bit build failure
  2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-28  0:18 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-28  0:19 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-01-28  8:12 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-28  0:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-28 00:18 -------
I bootstrapped again omitting --with-cpu=default32 and with -m64.  No problems.

I also built and installed gcc version 3.4.4 20050109 (prerelease) and used it
to bootstrap with -m64.  No problems.

--enable-threads=posix is the default for Linux, so that should not have any effect.

When I originally tried bootstrapping on PPC Linux, I had problems before I used
the incantation.  I do not remember if the failure was due to checking.  You
might try adding the following options to configure

--build=powerpc64-linux --host=powerpc64-linux --target=powerpc64-linux
--enable-shared --enable-__cxa_atexit

and see if that affects your results.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/19645] PPC64 64-bit build failure
  2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-01-28  0:19 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-01-28  8:12 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-28  8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-28 08:11 -------
I'm starting to think there's something wrong with the system 64-bit libc.
Lets close for now, and I'll report again if I can find something reproducible.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19645


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-01-28  8:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-01-26 19:36 [Bug target/19645] New: PPC64 64-bit build failure dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-26 20:52 ` [Bug target/19645] [4.0 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-26 21:05 ` [Bug target/19645] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-27 17:43 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-27 17:46 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-27 18:41 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-27 19:10 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com
2005-01-27 20:38 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-27 21:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-27 21:20 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com
2005-01-28  0:18 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-28  0:19 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-28  8:12 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).