public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Using -O2 cannot detect missing return statement in a function
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 01:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050127015842.22584.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031110230703.13000.cheng@powertv.com>


------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-27 01:58 -------
I am uninterested in fixing this for 3.4.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|rth at gcc dot gnu dot org  |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
                   |                            |dot org
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13000


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-01-27  1:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-10 23:07 [Bug optimization/13000] New: Using -Ox " cheng at powertv dot com
2003-11-10 23:13 ` [Bug optimization/13000] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-10 23:29 ` falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2003-11-10 23:36 ` [Bug optimization/13000] [tree-ssa] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-11  0:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-19 15:05 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-01  4:34 ` [Bug optimization/13000] [3.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-25  0:27 ` [Bug optimization/13000] [3.4 Regression] Using -O2 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-25  0:39 ` [Bug optimization/13000] [3.4 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-25 16:21 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2003-12-29 18:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-03 21:21 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-02-14 21:21 ` [Bug optimization/13000] [3.4/3.5 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-18  7:35 ` [Bug tree-optimization/13000] " rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-21 14:10 ` [Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4/4.0 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-18  0:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-19 15:51 ` ian at airs dot com
2005-01-21  2:52 ` ian at airs dot com
2005-01-21 19:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-21 19:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-21 19:07 ` [Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4 " ian at airs dot com
2005-01-21 19:14 ` ian at airs dot com
2005-01-27  1:58 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2005-04-12 17:35 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2005-04-12 18:49 ` ian at airs dot com
2005-05-19 17:49 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-05 15:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <bug-13000-1556@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-07  3:13 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-28  8:51 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050127015842.22584.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).