From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25366 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2005 07:14:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25327 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2005 07:14:45 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 07:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050127071445.25326.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "stevenb at suse dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040909235415.17387.hjl@lucon.org> References: <20040909235415.17387.hjl@lucon.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/17387] Redundant instructions in loop optimization X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg03989.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From stevenb at suse dot de 2005-01-27 07:14 ------- Subject: Re: Redundant instructions in loop optimization On Thursday 27 January 2005 07:05, rth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-27 > 06:05 ------- Steven, you do realize this is essentially unfixable without > a new pass that optimially places widened operations, don't you? No, I didn't :-) So you suggest closing this as SUSPEND? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17387