From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22789 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2005 13:36:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22725 invoked by uid 48); 27 Jan 2005 13:36:38 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050127133638.22724.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040909235415.17387.hjl@lucon.org> References: <20040909235415.17387.hjl@lucon.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/17387] Redundant instructions in loop optimization X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg04034.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-27 13:36 ------- (In reply to comment #13) > No, I didn't :-) > > So you suggest closing this as SUSPEND? Yes. But note IBM haifa is going to submit a pass for this and has been outlined before. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |SUSPENDED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17387