From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28552 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2005 13:43:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28459 invoked by uid 48); 27 Jan 2005 13:43:15 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050127134315.28458.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dmartin at cliftonlabs dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050124205844.19614.dmartin@cliftonlabs.com> References: <20050124205844.19614.dmartin@cliftonlabs.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/19614] Excessive memory consumption with a class with large (200) virtual (pure?) function and derived classes X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg04036.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dmartin at cliftonlabs dot com 2005-01-27 13:43 ------- As a point of reference, it's using around 550M on x86. A 50% expansion on a 64 bit architecture (with more registers and opcodes) does not seem completely unreasonable to me. So perhaps it's not a backend-specific issue at this point. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19614